I’ll leave that question as is. I’m still a bit perplexed doing the math. Given the vacancy rate that we have, the number of positions we have and still, at the end of the day, it appears that there’s money being tied up into vacant, unfilled positions to which, I believe, would have a huge benefit of accessibility should that money be profiled, or re-profiled for cases such as this where we need short-term money, especially near the end of the year when we’re really hitting the odometer reset in less than a month for April 1st. So again, it’s an accounting exercise of large proportion, but I did have to ask that.
Changing gears, Madam Chair, I want to talk about the corporate and personal income tax, or the collection of them. Last year at this time, if I recall, we were dealing with a collection mishap, or a collection faux pas, where we missed the mark, so to speak, on both the collection of corporate and personal income tax to the potential tune of about $38 million. That number is very slightly in some of the narratives in the House in the past year, but for the sake of argument, this was a $38 million miscalculation.
Can the department indicate, you know, we fast forward to today, what circumstances today have affected our short-term borrowing with potentially the miscalculation again with the short-term borrowing in relation to personal and corporate income tax collection? Thank you.