Thank you. I’ll return to the firefighting expenditure at a point in time, but for now I’ll leave it. The Minister and I have differing views in terms of what an appropriation for supplementation is and what a full cost accounting is. I think the two are two different animals of two different entities. So we’ll get back to that in due course.
It looks like $60 million did affect the bottom line with respect to short-term borrowing, which has a definite impact on the $275 million of room that we have. Interesting when I was listening in earlier to Mr. Bromley’s response and we heard from the deputy minister that as of April 1st we’re back in a surplus position. I found that comment to be a bit of a concern because really I don’t necessarily see it as surplus, but really that we’re back into an operating room or short-term borrowing. It’s as if we’ve got extra money to spend or that we have money to spend for operating. So maybe it’s a culture thing, but surplus is not necessarily the word I’m looking for. More of a comment.
To the issue of the low rider offset that was promised by the government back in the fall of 2014, this was a $20 million promise that later was discussed in the House. What impact did that $20 million low rider offset at the Snare River have on this situation we have before the House?