Thanks to the Minister for that. It gives me some comfort, but I am concerned that we are seemingly taking on more and more expenditures and basically just saying, well, that’s fine, we can borrow the money. I can say that I’m not sure if you’re considering everything and, you know, do we really have to go this much into short-term debt. But I do have faith in the Department of Finance and I do have faith in the Minister, so to ask that question, I’m going to get a rhetorical answer. So I will say it out loud but not expect an answer.
If we pass this bill it will then increase our limit to $300 million for short-term borrowing. I would hope that we are going to be reducing our short-term borrowing over the next number of years as we hopefully manage our finances and reduce these extraordinary expenditures that we have been incurring. So is it conceivable that this bill would be amended to reduce our borrowing limit to try and get us back to a situation where we are potentially, it’s all in the eye of the beholder, but potentially better off by having a lower borrowing limit? Something that would kind of keep us down to spending the money we have as opposed to borrowing to pay our bills. Thank you.