Mahsi cho, Mr. Speaker. I don’t believe I said that the community or the public did not deserve a retrospective analysis. I indicated that we had done some work with the Auditor General in looking at the bridge at the point when we took the bridge over from another project authority and changed the contractor. We also had a report done by independent people, the Levelton Report that was done from the time the bridge started until we took over the bridge, and DOT had done a couple of reports on lessons learned. I felt that that was sufficient for us to move forward using that bridge as lessons learned on other major projects that would be undertaken. It isn’t a matter of whether or not people deserved something; it was something we felt we could work with the information we had to move forward. Thank you.
Tom Beaulieu on Question 912-17(5): Deh Cho Bridge Project Review
In the Legislative Assembly on October 2nd, 2015. See this statement in context.
Question 912-17(5): Deh Cho Bridge Project Review
Oral Questions
October 1st, 2015
See context to find out what was said next.