Yes, thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I don't know where the positions went to so I don't know if we're better off. I don't know if the positions were taken out of communities that had low employment rates and put in the larger centres that have more crews. Larger centres that have more than four crews that could within themselves create… If they had 20 firefighters, for example, they could easily go from from four crews to five crews without any impact. Or if there's three crews and there's more people needed they'd have to come from some community. All I know is that the impact is felt by communities and that's what the problem is. Is that, like, are we going to go through a process of reducing PYs in any particular community? If we want to look at the 97 seasonal positions then I'll ask the Minister: can you provide us with where all the shifts occurred? Where did the PY shift to? Did the PY shift to Hay River? Or did the PY shift to another community? What happened? How did this come about where the crews got smaller?
Even if we were to be informed of the fact that we're moving to four-men crew, that's okay. But I need to know how we went through the process here in the House dealing with the Minister of Finance on this budget and not being advised that these PYs are being moved out of the position because they're only casuals anyway. But even casuals have families and we need to address that issue. Thank you.