Thank you, Mr. Chair. To the amendment. Taking into account the integrity of this institution and listening to my colleague across the way who has legal background and looking at the amendment and the wording on exceptional circumstances, that could be defined in several ways, if passed, could go against the integrity of this institution to use something so vague that would be caught up in litigation for several weeks or several months depending on the court's schedule to really define what is exceptional. By that time, two Assemblies may have passed. To me, it doesn't strengthen the integrity of this institution to have acts of loopholes or defined as loopholes, and really not viewed to the reader as a real defined terminology on exceptional circumstances. I just point that out, Mr. Chair. Thank you.
Daniel McNeely on Motion To Amend Committee Motion 91-18(2), Defeated
In the Legislative Assembly on March 9th, 2017. See this statement in context.
Motion To Amend Committee Motion 91-18(2), Defeated
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
March 8th, 2017
See context to find out what was said next.