Thanks, Mr. Chair. I appreciate the response. That's good to hear. If I just do the math here and add in 441k from 2016-17 to 2017-18, there are obviously some other things that are going on here within the Watershed Management function of the ENR.
Sorry, I'll just digress here for a second. Part of the problem is there's just no detail provided in the mains or even in the business plan about what this money is being spent on. I guess I would urge the department to find a better way to present what's going on with these functions in their business plan so that we can actually see where any money is brought in or things are being sunsetted and reduced and so on. I think it might have been in an earlier version of the business plan that we saw, but it's certainly not in the public version. That's just an aside.
Maybe I could ask if that's something that the department could look into so we don't have these big globs of money and not really knowing what's going on within the function. Thanks, Mr. Chair.