Thank you, Mr. Chair. I thank Dr. Kelly for her answer. I'm just struggling with this whole process that there seems to be redundancies they say in the Deh Cho but in some of the other regions, there's more positions in there. I'm looking at one region where there are four positions combining these two or we'll have one. I'm struggling with how this works because you talked about water resources is that area. I'm looking at that page and this page here. There seems to be a large number in certain areas. That is a big concern for me.
It also really pushes my concern that it seems to be the smaller communities that are suffering these reductions here. I'm really, really concerned about that. It goes against what I feel is in the mandate and it also goes against the introduction that talks about the environment in our region. The environment is very important. It is very important for the DFN, and very important for the First Nations and for all municipal governments. By removing this position, it seems to be hindering this. Again, I don't understand the logic to it if the environment is this important and we're reducing it to only one position. It really doesn't say much for the Deh Cho. Thank you, Mr. Chair.