I agree that those are important facilities, as well, and that does extend the time when these seniors will be able to remain in their home. Some of the decisions that I'm talking about where, to be very specific, if we were to look at the Great Elders Facility in Fort Resolution that if we were able to use those four units, we could be extending the time when the individuals stay in that community for an additional 10 years, perhaps, instead of going from in their own home, where I'm not seeing the effort that the Minister is talking about. I'm not seeing that in the community. I'm not seeing a whole bunch of units becoming barrier-free, as an example, and I'm talking about turning units barrier-free of people that are 70 years old, and, instead of moving into long-term care when they're 80, they would move into long-term care when they were 90 years old, for example; an extension of 10 years. So I'd like to ask the Minister if he could again look at that, recognizing what's in place but adding to that through aging in place and looking at those facilities that were previously shut down?
Tom Beaulieu on Question 295-18(3): Quarrying Fees and Royalties
In the Legislative Assembly on May 25th, 2018. See this statement in context.
Question 295-18(3): Quarrying Fees and Royalties
Oral Questions
May 25th, 2018
Page 3961
See context to find out what was said next.