Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and thanks, colleagues, for allowing me to share my views on this motion here. In my previous life, I was extremely, I would say, happy to hear that the parties behind this piece of infrastructure did their many efforts in securing the necessary funds to not only create employment, but create access. In my view, and I have a similar project under way in my riding, which is incomplete, this motion refers to a project that is not complete. You've got security requirements through the whole back of contractual arrangements which protects you in reviewing the deficiencies come the audit time, which is provisions of the contract or arrangement. So I foresee this as putting the cart before the horse. So given that and my previous experience, I don't think I can support this motion at this time. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Daniel McNeely on Motion 17-18(3): Review of Inuvik to Tuktoyaktuk Highway Project, Defeated
In the Legislative Assembly on May 31st, 2018. See this statement in context.
Motion 17-18(3): Review of Inuvik to Tuktoyaktuk Highway Project, Defeated
Motions
May 31st, 2018
Page 4134
See context to find out what was said next.