I have directed the department to do some additional work in this area to see if that is a possibility. It was a question I asked when I brought forward the legislation the first time, recognizing that it is going to take a bit of time to operationalize this and make this official. At that time, the concern was having a legal document that had two names on it could be problematic, especially when it came to being out of jurisdiction or working with the feds on things like passports. I have asked the department to explore that and seek a second opinion on that because, in my mind, it's not two names; it's one name. It's one name that is using the traditional font, which is a true representation of the child's name, or the person's name, and a Latin interpretation of it. It's not a different name; it's a font issue. So I have asked for a second opinion on whether or not we can put the name twice, the same name twice, using two different fonts on a document.
That's not a solution, Mr. Speaker. I feel that that's a step to getting us to where we need to be. Ultimately, we just want to be able to have the one name using the one font, but, given that that is going to take time, I've asked them to explore the possibility of having the name on there twice, in two different fonts. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.