Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Similar to the initial clause 8, the regulations are worded very broadly to allow for thresholds. Having said that, if the clause itself is mandatory for the provision of security, the issue is raised as to whether the provision of no security below a certain threshold defeats the intention of the clause, and I'm simply not sure how that issue would be resolved were somebody to challenge the Minister not requiring at least a nominal amount of security.
Law Clerk on Committee Motion 204-18(3): Bill 46: Public Land Act - Amend Clause 8 with addition after sub clause (1), Defeated
In the Legislative Assembly on August 19th, 2019. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 204-18(3): Bill 46: Public Land Act - Amend Clause 8 with addition after sub clause (1), Defeated
Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
August 19th, 2019
Page 6181
Law Clerk
See context to find out what was said next.