Thank you, Mr. Chair. I would like to narrow in here. I think a lot of those are old abandoned cabins. I have seen a few that are garbage, and it's probably great for Lands to go and clean those sites up. Quite a few of those are going to be rights holders, and I am confident that Lands will work with Indigenous governments for a process to that. Then there is a category of post-2015 and no chance of getting a lease; we will just knock them down eventually, and that will cost us time and money. What I have heard from constituents, the most concern, is the pre-2015 structures that would be eligible for a lease, and there is that concern of are we now rewarding squatters; they never got in the cabin lottery. I am wondering if we have a sense of how many of those structures actually fit, are in that category, even a ball park. Yes, I will start with that. How many do we believe would actually be eligible for a lease? Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Rylund Johnson on Committee Motion 79-19(2): Tabled Document 286-19(2): Main Estimates 2021-2022 - Lands - Corporate Management - Deletion of $303,000 from Grants, Contributions and Transfers, Defeated
In the Legislative Assembly on February 24th, 2021. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 79-19(2): Tabled Document 286-19(2): Main Estimates 2021-2022 - Lands - Corporate Management - Deletion of $303,000 from Grants, Contributions and Transfers, Defeated
Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
February 24th, 2021
Page 2095
See context to find out what was said next.