Thanks, Madam Chair. Like my colleague from Yellowknife North, I believe that the potential for P3s is starting to create an incentive to do large infrastructure projects in that way so that we take some of the long-term debt off the books, so to speak, and put it into long-term contracts that affect our capacity for O and M spending. I do think it's starting to create an incentive do to that, and I'm not sure, with all of the criticism that there has been in the past in other jurisdictions about P3s, that that's a great way to proceed.
I do think I want to take the Minister up on that opportunity to have a briefing on the Fiscal Responsibility Policy and look at it more closely, but I want to go to the total consolidated borrowing. It looks like it's $1.59 billion at the end of this upcoming year, and that is getting, to me, pretty close to the debt limit of $1.8 billion. We're going to exceed that in a future year if we stay on this track. I guess I'm worried about what would happen if we had unforeseen circumstances around forest fires or something. We're going to exceed this long-term borrowing debt perhaps as early as this year or maybe next year if there were some unforeseen circumstances. Do we actually have a longer-term plan to not exceed the debt limit, and if so, what is it? Thanks, Madam Chair.