Yeah, thank you, Madam Chair. I appreciate the Member finally getting there. Yeah, I just -- you -- I think if you applied to sell, you know, the Tlicho, Gwich'in, or Inuvialuit, or Sahtu settlement lands under a constitutionally-protected agreement, you just can't. That's pretty clear to me. But it's less clear to me whether how, you know -- that's kind of just a backstop saying you can't sell them. How is the government interpreting this applying to them? So this is passed. Someone doesn't get paid on a Tlicho project on their lands and goes to file a lien, is land titles going to accept a lien on those lands? Thank you.
Rylund Johnson on Committee Motion 503-19(2): Bill 65: Builders' Lien Act - New Clause 3.1, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on October 4th, 2023. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 503-19(2): Bill 65: Builders' Lien Act - New Clause 3.1, Carried
Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
October 4th, 2023
Page 6745
See context to find out what was said next.