Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, keeping control of the revenues in the Northwest Territories allows us to do exactly what the Member is saying and to look at where -- once the carbon tax come in, are there costs that we have not accounted for? The Yukon system, I don't want to speak to another government's system, but very briefly, it is based on assets. It is not based on fuel usage. It is not a direct offset. It is not an uncomplicated system, Mr. Speaker. What we are anticipating, and having done calculations of fuel usage over the last few years, we can anticipate what the added costs to business are that will be passed down to the consumers and residents and add that in to the cost of living offset so that businesses can raise their costs and pass that down. But, on the other end, we were able to include that with the cost of living offset so that the market can adjust for the private sector, but that's so residents don't see themselves penalized as a result of that. And again, as we move forward, if we are maintaining control over the revenues, we're able to continue to adapt that system as we go forward.
Mr. Speaker, this is not a wash for us. There's quite a number in addition to the cost of living offset. Mr. Speaker, we're paying income assistance -- for folks that are on income assistance living in public housing, the GNWT's covering all those increased costs. So this is not some great, great revenue source in general. There's, you know, tens of millions of dollars being spent on strategic energy initiatives. Money that's being spent over on climate change initiatives with the department of ENR. Far in excess of any extra amount that we are getting in the revenue in the carbon tax. So, again, thank you, Mr. Speaker. I'll leave it at that and see where the next question takes me.