Yeah, you know, I've said this before, I'll say it again. Either they should be arm's length and set policies on who can get into rental housing, apply for money, take on assets, or let's take those staff, bring them into the housing corporation, make them public servants, you know, are transferrable, that we can keep a track of waitlists, maintenance lists. It just seems -- I don't see any benefit to this current approach. I am of the view that giving them more authority is the way to go if we actually want local control, but. Yeah, I will try and frame that as a question.
Going forward, are we revisiting this question of, you know, whether LHOs have the proper list of responsibilities and whether perhaps, you know, allowing them to have different localized policies to their communities is in fact something we would want? Thank you, Madam Chair.