Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Members. Although the land claim and the creation of Nunavut are not the same, many Inuit who are concerned about the extinguishment clause in the final agreement want to have a firm commitment about Nunavut before they can ratify the land claim agreement. For this reason the plebiscite about the boundary must be held before the land claim agreement is ratified. While the results of the plebiscite will not be binding, we can expect that the federal government will be influenced by a strong show of support for the boundary.
Another decision that was made in Iqaluit was to have the ratification vote for the land claim on June 30th, July 1st and July 2nd. This is another important step along the road to self-determination by the people of Nunavut.
Article 4 of the TFN claim deals with the creation of Nunavut and with the negotiation of a political accord by TFN and the two governments. We had a lengthy discussion about the contents of such an accord, and about the timing of the establishment of the new government for the Nunavut territory, should we be able to agree on the outstanding issues such as the financial implications of two new territories and the powers and authorities that the new territories will exercise.
There was also much discussion on the timing of the establishment of the territory of Nunavut and it was recommended that the first election of the new government would occur in 1999. This would allow for the seven year transition period beginning from the introduction of the legislation creating Nunavut into the House of Commons in 1992, and ending with the establishment of Nunavut in 1999. This transition period is essential for proper planning and preparation for the new territory.
It was agreed during this summit that the Nunavut caucus, with the assistance of TFN, will play a key role in the planning of the new territory and will participate actively in the new transition and implementation commission that will be established to negotiate the details of the new territory.
During the course of the summit we also heard from Roger Gruben, chairman of the Inuvialuit Regional Corporation, and from Senator Charlie Watt of Makivik Corporation. We appreciated hearing of the experiences and wisdom of these individuals in a post-claim period. Mr. Gruben spoke of the desire of the Inuvialuit to establish a Western Arctic regional municipality in the Beaufort Sea area. The Nunavut caucus can sympathize with the Inuvialuit and support them in their deliberations as part of a Western Arctic territory, but ultimately it will be up to the Western Arctic leadership to deal with the issue.
On the last morning of the summit we spoke on the responsibilities of leadership. Our leaders are working hard and are under a lot of stress. We discussed how we can work together and support one another. Our elders gave us good advice and guidance as they told of the changes that they have seen within their lifetime. They told us to learn from our mistakes and to respect ourselves and each other.
We heard from our youth. We keep saying that the youth of our society are the future of all of us, and we included them in the summit as full participants. Our women's associations spoke to us and clearly and forcefully pointed out the issue of leadership and the need to be examples for our people. They want to have an equal role in the creation of a Nunavut government and the work associated with it.
Mr. Speaker, we learned a lot from this summit. We made decisions affecting the future of Nunavut and built alliances among the leaders of Nunavut that will ensure that our plans can be realized. Also, Mr. Speaker, at the end of the conference there was a very good feeling and I would just like to quote our women's leader. At the end of the meeting they told us that they felt uplifted and lighter because of the discussions that took place regarding leadership. We need to be more responsible toward our women counterparts in the Northwest Territories. Qujannamiik.