Yes, thank you, Mr. Speaker. I appreciate that it is a technical question, and as Mr. Todd knows, I have quite a few constituents right now moving out of town, back to the south. They are interested in the ultimate removal entitlement. Maybe if I can phrase it in an example way, and then he can tell me if I am right or wrong, and inform the House.
In Iqaluit, the cap is $10,284, and if the employee is only entitled to 50 percent of the benefit, and arranges to move for half of that amount, which would be $5,142, is this all that is reimbursed, fifty percent of the actual cost of removal, or is it only fifty percent of what is actually spent by the employee?