Mr. Speaker, I agree with the Minister that clearly those are two very separate questions that have to be able to stand alone on their individual merit, on any type of ballot that may be brought out. Could the Minister confirm, in spite of the personal preferences that may be demonstrated by MLAs such as myself in terms of a name, that when this issue is discussed and addressed it will be from the same objective point of view as getting feedback for the constitutional package? That we are not going to be trying to sell a particular point of view, but listen to what the people have to say in regards to a name? Thank you.
Michael Miltenberger on Question 452-13(4): Federal Involvement In Constitutional Process
In the Legislative Assembly on March 4th, 1997. See this statement in context.
Supplementary To Question 452-13(4): Federal Involvement In Constitutional Process
Question 452-13(4): Federal Involvement In Constitutional Process
Item 6: Oral Questions
March 3rd, 1997
Page 1079
See context to find out what was said next.