Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I will advise the boards of the Member's interest in the issue. Thank you.
Debates of Jan. 30th, 1998
Topics
Further Return To Question 165-13(5): Consistency In Non-violence Policies
Question 165-13(5): Consistency In Non-violence Policies
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 455
Further Return To Question 165-13(5): Consistency In Non-violence Policies
Question 165-13(5): Consistency In Non-violence Policies
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 455
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Thank you. Oral questions. Mr. Steen.
Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 455

Vince Steen Nunakput
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I would like to follow up on Mr. Ootes' question. I understand this government operates on a zero tolerance policy. So I am wondering how could schools or school boards have a policy that is contrary to them.
Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 455
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
We did not get the recording on that Mr. Steen, can you repeat your question please?
Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 455

Vince Steen Nunakput
Mr. Speaker, my question is to the Minister of Education. I understand this government has a policy in place of zero tolerance as far as violence is concerned. My question is, how can the education boards or authorities have a policy that is contrary to that. Thank you.
Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 455
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
The Minister of Education, Culture and Employment. Mr. Dent.
Return To Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 455

Charles Dent Yellowknife Frame Lake
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Perhaps we should clarify again for the Member that the Government of the Northwest Territories does not have a policy of zero tolerance to violence. The zero tolerance policy is a policy of this Legislative Assembly only, and applies to the 24 Members of this Legislative Assembly. That is all that zero tolerance policy applies to. I did not say that the DEC policies would necessarily be any different from that policy. Each individual DEC is required under the Education Act to establish a violence policy. One that works in their region and in their communities. Each one is required to have their own policy. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Return To Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 455
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Thank you. Oral questions. Supplementary. Question period is over but I will allow you to conclude your supplementaries. Mr. Steen.
Supplementary To Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 455

Vince Steen Nunakput
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I was under the impression that this government has a zero tolerance policy as far as violence is concerned in particular, zero tolerance for spousal abuse. We have heard that many times. I have also seen signs in health centres where it says zero tolerance. I have also seen signs in schools that say zero tolerance policy in this government. So, I am surprised to hear Mr. Dent say that it only applies to the Members of this Legislative Assembly. I was always under the impression that it applied to government wide. Could I have some more clarification in that Mr. Dent. Thank you.
Supplementary To Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 455
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Mr. Dent.
Further Return To Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 455

Charles Dent Yellowknife Frame Lake
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I just conferred with the Minister responsible for FMBS just to confirm my understanding of the situation and he concurs that there is no policy at present for zero tolerance in the government. The policy that has been adopted applies only to the 24 Members of this House. The Minister for FMBS also tells me that he is in concurrence for a wider policy for zero tolerance but it is so far, not one that has been adopted. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Further Return To Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Question 166-13(5): Policy On Zero Tolerance For Violence
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 455
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Thank you. Question period is over. Item 7, written questions. Item 8, returns to written questions. Item 9, replies to opening address. Ms. Thompson.
Reply 1-13(5): Ms. Thompson's Reply
Item 9: Replies To Opening Address
Page 455
Manitok Thompson Aivilik
I am pleased to be standing again and I will say what I wanted to say previously and I will take the time to say it now with out being nayed. I am a little disappointed that some Members choose to nay my request to conclude my Member's statement as I have always chosen to allow Members the opportunity to speak on behalf of their constituency. So although some Members may not agree with my statement, I have chosen to use my reply to the opening address to voice my concern on behalf of my constituency.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to make an observation. My Member's statement today is about how we work together in a consensus style government to make things better for the people in our constituencies. Our Legislative Assembly is unique in Canada and, indeed, the world. Mr. Speaker, as we all know just because we have consensus government does not mean that we always agree. There is room for debates and arguments in this House, but that is not my concern. My concern is how we are handling conflicts and how the media is reacting to them. We all know some leaders are taking advantage of these conflicts and using them to gain recognition through the newspaper, radio and television.
Mr. Speaker, is it more important to get your face in the paper and television then to prove your leadership professionally? This problem will only become worse as we draw near the next election. (Translation) I would like to say this in Inuktitut. We have been hearing a lot about the Keewatin. Is it more important to get your face in the paper and television then to prove your leadership professionally? This problem will only become worse as we draw near the next election. I think this is recognized all over and I just wanted to repeat that. (Translation ends).
The Keewatin has been portrayed as a region in chaos and has even been referred to as having Third World conditions. (Translation) I would like to define what I mean by Third World conditions, having a Third World condition portrayed on the Keewatin. It seems that people are looking at the Keewatin going through starvation and the third world conditions is a word I am using. I would like to tell the Inuit if they were watching television and you see programs about children starving, people living in hard conditions, not having the facilities that we have today like toilets and water and electricity, those are the types of conditions that we seem to be seen as. It seems as if people are looking at the Keewatin as children starving, people living on the streets and it seems as if we could be looked as having children that need to be adopted by the more fortunate. (Translation ends)
I am very concerned that some of the statements that have been made in this House and in the media have been unfair to the residents of the Keewatin. Mr. Speaker, this humiliating label is unfair and insulting to the Keewatin residents and especially each and every one of the health board members from the communities. (Translation) The people in our communities are trying to work with the health board. They are trying to work towards trying to make it better for the community. This is the way we are looked at in the region. This includes the communities of the Keewatin which consist of seven communities that have people who are representatives on the health boards and remain on those health boards (Translation ends) ... communities I believe, they deserve an apology. Our region has always been well known for being pro-active and productive. I will challenge anyone of the Members who has criticized the efforts of these community members, come on over to my communities, come on over to those communities, see those members yourselves face to face and repeat what you have said about them.
--Applause
Like every other region in the north, we have our problems. I would like to say today, the Keewatin region, they are strong individuals, strong leaders in each of those communities who have been embarrassed so much by statements, by rumours of people who do not understand their traditional ways of resolving conflicts. These people need an apology. You are working in a different system. There are two systems here. It is a challenge to be a leader, an aboriginal leader, understanding both cultures. These people, these Inuit leaders, the Inuit elders who are not understanding what has been happening here, the chaos. It is a work of scam artists into our culture. That is the only translation I can say about this. These strong individuals, proud people from the Keewatin, they can work in a rational manner to identify and resolve issues. You do not know what you have done to a culture that can stand up to you face to face and solve these conflicts without spreading rumours. It has been to the advantage of those people who like to see their pictures in the papers, on the television. Do you think these elders pick up the newspapers and read what you say? We have an oral tradition. You have a written tradition. What you say orally means a lot more to me as an Inuk than what you say on paper. I am getting a little bit emotional here, but that is what I had to say. It is not because I hate anybody. It is because I wanted to make a point today. It has been going on too long. It just has been going too long. That is why I am a politician today because I wanted to say these types of things. There are two different types of systems here and you have to learn today that when you are an aboriginal leader, it is a challenge to try to balance two cultures.
Our traditional Inuit culture has taught us that it is better to work together to solve problems than just to criticize and criticize and criticize others spreading rumours for your advantage. It is also not acceptable to call attention to oneself or to use a leadership position to put down the efforts of others. Do you know how many times those board members sat down and tried to solve those problems? None of those people who criticized them ever actually sat down with them and tried to talk with them and tried to listen to what changes they were trying to make. Spreading rumours, untrue statements and negative criticism is childish in my culture. Be a man. It is immature. I, myself, was always taught by my elders, by my mom and dad, who are traditional that it is extremely rude to behave in this manner. This is part of my concern today,
Mr. Speaker, that we remain committed to a consensus style of government. One that reflects traditional values of cooperation and working together in mutual respect. When elders and people in communities see leaders, constantly criticizing for months at each other in the media without resolving their conflicts, they become concerned about their leaders. It is especially confusing for the unilingual people and elders to hear these things on the radio or television. It is a system they are not understanding. It is no wonder they become concerned about the future of Nunavut.
I understand that there are different ways of doing politics. I understand perfectly. There are individuals who do politics differently. I do understand that and there are very good politicians that I have learned from or who I am still learning from and Members of this House who I am learning from. There are different ways of doing politics. It has been a challenge to be an aboriginal MLA and having to observe and understand both cultures based on different values and different ways of thinking. Mr. Speaker, we have very little time left before two new territories are created in 1999. We are the people that are making history here. We are the last government until this land divides into two. Let us work together for the collective good of all the people in the east and in the west. Let us strive to put personality politics behind us. Our people deserve better. This is what is expected of us leaders. Thank you, Mr. Speaker and I would like to thank the Members for letting me speak what I wanted to say on my mind. Thank you.
--Applause
Reply 1-13(5): Ms. Thompson's Reply
Item 9: Replies To Opening Address
Page 457
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Thank you. Replies to opening address. Your point of order, Mr. O'Brien.
Point of Order
Reply 1-13(5): Ms. Thompson's Reply
Item 9: Replies To Opening Address
Page 457
Kevin O'Brien Kivallivik
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My point of order is, I believe the honourable Member is misleading the House in reference to comments that were made about Third World conditions. Mr. Speaker, they were made in relation to health and social services. Mr. Speaker, when we look at the 25 social services people or staff in the Keewatin, with only seven, seven in place, that is Third World. When you look at one nurse that has to serve 1,600 members over Christmas that is Third World...
Reply 1-13(5): Ms. Thompson's Reply
Item 9: Replies To Opening Address
Page 457
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Can we have some order please. Your point of order, Mr. O'Brien.
Reply 1-13(5): Ms. Thompson's Reply
Item 9: Replies To Opening Address
Page 457
Kevin O'Brien Kivallivik
Mr. Speaker, my point of order is, the honourable Member with her comments is misleading the House.
Reply 1-13(5): Ms. Thompson's Reply
Item 9: Replies To Opening Address
Page 457
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Thank you, Mr. O'Brien. You do not have a point of order. Replies to opening address. We will take a 15-minute break.
--Break
Reply 1-13(5): Ms. Thompson's Reply
Item 9: Replies To Opening Address
Page 457
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
The House will come back to order. We are on item 10, replies to budget address. Mrs. Groenewegen.
Reply 7-13(5): Mrs. Groenewegen's Reply
Item 10: Replies To Budget Address
Page 457

Jane Groenewegen Hay River
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I am taking the opportunity today, under replies to the Budget Address to speak to a number of things that I have been pondering for some time. Many of my colleagues have spoken to the specifics of the Budget Address and the details of various programs and initiatives, most of which I agree are positive directions.
I would like to focus my comments on the broader subject which is indirectly related to the way this government spends money. Mr. Speaker, listening to some of the comments made in the House by our leaders, one would wonder who they talk to, where they go and what they read. They seem oblivious to the fact that we have a very serious problem in this government. Everyone including myself would like to get on with the business of governing and look to the future.
Sometimes we have to stop and assess the way we are doing things. We have a fundamental flaw in our terms of reference, our game plan or the rules of engagement if you will. It strikes at the very credibility of the way in which we do business and brings into question everything that we do and say. I hear contradictions proclaimed almost every day with such resolve that I am starting to think that the person saying them actually believes themselves.
Let me give you a few examples and let us use examples from just this week in the House. For example, the Finance Minister in response to putting more money into food payments for income support clients says and I quote, "we are working under very difficult fiscal conditions". Mr. Speaker, we know that at least one quarter of a million dollars was available for a PPD privatization report that no one wanted or needed. The Premier, for example, in response to concerns raised about health care in the Keewatin health situation, and I quote, "I believe the health care in the Keewatin is quite adequate and does its purpose". However, we know that shortage of staff, basic management deficiencies and shortages of supplies are putting northerners at some risk. The people impacted by these and many other issues must marvel at these detached decrees or maybe they do not even listen anymore.
Mr. Speaker, I do not know if anyone is hearing what I am saying, but let me say it again. We have a responsibility to uphold the confidence of our constituents in this government, and spouting platitudes about responsible and good government sometimes appears to fly in the face of reality and the serious concerns facing our constituents. Getting back to one of the most pervasive and systemic problems, there is an inordinate amount of suspicion, distrust and disrespect in the public when it comes to the credibility of this government. We must examine what this stems from. Much of the suspicion surrounding this government relates to the lack of transparency in contract awards, hiring practices and what seems to be very discretionary spending. Whether you are a frustrated business person responding to a request for proposal, who is unsuccessful and will never know why or you are a person seeking employment running into a seemingly endless invisible barrier, whether you are just an enlightened taxpayer, whether you are the recipient of programs and services delivered by this government or you are a front-line worker struggling to do more with less, people want a government that is accountable, transparent and a good steward of the public purse.
One might argue that all governments have been criticized because of unpopular decisions. Mr. Speaker, I would argue that this government falls into a different category. All we have to do is compare this Assembly with the previous 12th Assembly. I was a follower of the government for many years before coming to this House. Although, people did not agree with every decision the government made, they did not despair over the integrity of the government as they do now.
We have fallen down in the area of openness and communication. The constructive criticism I direct at our leadership is purely on a professional level. On a personal note, going back two years, I came to this Legislature under the threat of being, and I will quote, "stuffed in a corner for four years if I got out of line". Mr. Speaker, I do not know if this was because some Members were traumatized by a female Member of the 12th Assembly and that they were still not over it, and since I am a woman, perhaps I would naturally cause grief. I think it was more likely that they knew that I possessed the skills to communicate and would not be particularly amenable to being too quiet, kissing too many, I do not know what word to use there, or being co-opted into any schemes.
I thought I should respond to this notice by standing up on the first day and facilitating a public process for selecting a Premier. I hope that I have established that I am not really a good person to threaten or try to intimidate. Like everyone else, I had to learn, but I confess that I am not satisfied anymore nor do I consider it to be an effective use of my privilege as a Member to stand up every day for two and a half minutes and state my opinion on a diverse range of subjects. Although I will continue to comment on subjects that I consider relevant to my constituents and northern constituents, my underlying mission is going to be what I have dubbed the truth and transparency commission.
I began to be approached almost from the beginning of my term with questions about issues, instances, innuendoes, irregularities that I was not able to respond to. I did not know the answers. I was not really sure how to get the answers and I was not assured that these were my problems. At the prompting of many of my constituents and continuing to receive questions, I made a commitment to get some answers to questions people were asking. We do not have an ombudsman or any central mechanism or process by which concerns can be compiled and measured other than contacting individual MLAs to make complaints or raise concerns. Mr. Speaker, I am prepared to respond to these questions because in the big picture, what this government does affects us all.
Mr. Speaker, there is despair in the public and as a believer in the democratic process, this saddens me. The people wonder who will stand up. I am going to attempt to stand up for them and I know that other Members of this House are going to stand up as well. I believe along with my colleagues, we will only be able to be strong advocates on their behalf of a more accountable transparent government if they hear from our constituents. This is actually a very good group of Ordinary MLAs. I know some people have been disappointed by the lack of cohesive effort on the part of the Ordinary Members' Caucus and there are a lot of contributing factors to this, not the least of which is our collective newness to the job. Also in our defence, I will reveal that there is very subtle intimidation techniques employed here.
For example, ridiculing a Member that takes exception to something the government does, it is a natural part of this style of government we have. It is very subtle. It is a constant little game of alienating, patronizing, criticizing, flattering and the tactics are endless. Sometimes it is carried out in the name of being responsible. For example, they will say, that is not a good thing to bring up right now because we are at a sensitive time in our negotiations with Ottawa or, if we bring that out in the public our credibility will be injured, and so on. For example, Mr. Speaker, a Minister, after recently returning from a meeting in Ottawa, informed some of the Members that someone in Ottawa, supposedly Ottawa hangs on to every word in our Hansard, referred to our mid-term review by Ordinary Members as a midnight seance with a bunch of jokers and clowns. Mr. Speaker, that even is a subtle form of intimidation.
Anyhow, back to my subject and in conclusion, Mr. Speaker, we cannot effectively represent in a vacuum. The electorate also has an important role to play. The enemies of democracy are ignorance and apathy. People do not have the right to complain if they do not participate in the process. To combat ignorance, it is their duty to keep themselves appraised of the issues and how the government is responding to those issues. To battle apathy, they need to get involved, phone their MLA, write a letter to their local newspaper, talk to their friends, attend constituency meetings. We need to hear from the electorate. Not only about what we are doing wrong, but what we are doing right. I really appreciate the phone calls and faxes that I have received over the last few days in support to the questions that I have been asking in the House.
The choice is simple. I have heard our government called a banana republic. This conjures up a picture of an isolated dictatorship where might is right, the friends of the regime in power do well and the enemies of the regime in power are out in the cold. The alternative is an open transparent functioning democracy where people feel welcome and are encouraged to participate, not only on election day, but at any time. In a democracy the leaders should be the humble diligent hard working representatives of the people. When any leader becomes caught up in the power or prestige of the job, begins to lose perspective and lets their sense of responsibility turn into vanity or a delusion of importance which feeds some egotistical bent, we are, indeed, in trouble and things begin to unravel.
In summary, Mr. Speaker, to northerners I say get involved, do not give up, do not get discouraged, get organized and get active. To my colleagues, I say, let us get organized, let us not let our words, our ideas and our recommendations go unheeded. To the Cabinet, I say, please stand up and be counted. Let us demonstrate the highest standards of transparency and restore confidence and be the most humble servants of the people. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
--Applause
Reply 7-13(5): Mrs. Groenewegen's Reply
Item 10: Replies To Budget Address
Page 458
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Thank you. We are on replies to the Budget Address. Respond to the Budget Address, please. Mr. Rabesca.
Reply 8-13(5): Mr. Rabesca's Reply
Item 10: Replies To Budget Address
January 29th, 1998
Page 458
James Rabesca North Slave
Mr. Speaker, in reviewing the last Budget Address for this government for the combined Northwest
Territories, I was reminded of the beginning of our term in office. We all came here knowing we had many hard decisions to make that would affect a great deal of our residents and staff members. It was our goal to realize a balanced budget by the end of our term. I would now like to congratulate the honourable Minister of Finance for his tenacity in staying on course and achieving our goals.
Yes, Mr. Speaker, we have suffered greatly throughout this process and now I feel the worst is over. However, we must remain focused and stay on course. Particularly during the last months before division. It was good to see the issues of funding for the two territories may soon be finalized. This, of course, will bring more stability to both Territories. Work is continuing on the division of assets and liabilities along with other important decisions in this regard to ensure that all aspects of division are done in a fair and equitable manner. This, I believe, shows progress and true commitment from all of us, and also allows us the time needed to review everything prior to division. It is good to see the government is developing new and imaginative methods to assist the important small business sector that is now starting to expand. Small business is a very important sector of our community that over time can provide many new jobs in all of our communities.
The Northwest Territories Investment Tax Credit Program sounds at the outset a very interesting way to provide business with potential investment dollars. This is needed to assist our communities' growth and develop a long term, sustainable economy. From the Minister's statements on the Northern Employment Strategy, this program has succeeded during its first year of operation and I am glad to see that it is again in place and with even more dollars available. I hope this means there will be even more training, job creation and business development. This again is very good for our residents.
However, I would suggest that in order to succeed this program and any other business development programs that we have must be processed in a timely manner. We cannot have proposals coming in then waiting for months to be approved or not. Public/Private Partnerships do seem to be the way to increase our infrastructure and at the same time provide needed jobs and business opportunities. Again I feel we must step softly and carefully in this venture. I would like to be assured that projects that will be considered for this would allow, for smaller businesses and community businesses, the opportunity to be utilized. I do not want to see big businesses given free rein on this. If we are to provide trained residents for all aspects of our economy we must allow for smaller companies and community organizations to prosper.
Over the course of the past year, we have heard from many of my colleagues raising concerns about the lack of housing and the terrible condition of housing units in the communities. With the Accelerated Home Ownership Program, hopefully, we will start to put a dent in this very important concern. We have also heard many times how the cutbacks and downsizing has affected many of our residents. The restructuring of the social programs and the enforcement of income support regulations is getting residents to realize they cannot live by government alone. The introduction of the NWT Child Benefit will definitely help lower income families. It has been said that this money should go directly to the children through a variety of programs. To this all I can say is, it is the parents who must take responsibility for their families. Lastly I would like to congratulate the Minister of Finance again for this budget. I feel it shows we are on the road to rebuilding but yet conservative enough to ensure a balanced budget and a reduction to our overall deficit will take place. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
--Applause
Reply 8-13(5): Mr. Rabesca's Reply
Item 10: Replies To Budget Address
Page 459
The Speaker Samuel Gargan
Thank you, Mr. Rabesca. Replies to the Budget Address, Mr. Erasmus.
Reply 9-13(5): Mr. Erasmus' Reply
Item 10: Replies To Budget Address
Page 459
Roy Erasmus Yellowknife North
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to first of all start off by thanking the Premier for agreeing to reinstituting this government's central switchboard. I am sure it was due to the well reasoned and researched arguments put forth in this House by some of the Members in this House. Mr. Speaker, I will be following the format of the Finance Minister's Budget Address.
The first thing that the Minister touched on was the government anticipates a small surplus and a reduction in the accumulated deficit. Mr. Speaker, I think we should applaud this, but it is not only the politicians who have to take credit for this. The people of the Northwest Territories have been asked to and have taken cuts in programs and services as well as layoffs. We have to thank people for putting up with this.
Also the bureaucrats who have implemented our policies. We have to thank them as well. I know it is very difficult to say, no, to people when people have perhaps in their own mind, they have legitimate questions and requests. However, in order to achieve a balanced budget we have to toe the line. I believe this is a good way to end our budgetary relationship with our comrades from the east. This is the last budget that we will be working on and improving together. To have a balanced budget I think is a good way of doing it.
On the issue of the pay equity. This has been going on for a long time, but as the Minister has indicated we cannot agree to a settlement that forces further job loss or program and service reduction to our people. Mr. Speaker, as I indicated earlier, we have already gone through program and service reductions and job loss and we cannot go any further. So I urge both sides to work together and to come to an agreement on a reasonable settlement.
In the area of the Formula Financing Agreement, the Minister indicated he has been working with his federal counterparts for financial arrangements based on the expenditure base of each territory which should be determined separately and based on each region's requirements. This, of course, is a good way of doing things, Mr. Speaker. We in the west have stated many times we support the creation of Nunavut and the aspirations of the people in Nunavut, but we cannot agree to implement this dream at our expense. Meaning that the programs and services in the west should not deteriorate because of implementing this.
At the same time, Mr. Speaker, we have to recognize that most likely there will be several advantages because of the division. The main one being that both sides will be able to fully concentrate on their particular problems and aspirations. Although we have dealt with the aspirations and problems of both in the past, it will just make it simpler to not have to deal with the extra problems and aspirations from the other side of the territories.
The existing staff of the GNWT, Mr. Speaker, they are our most valuable resource. They have experience and knowledge that has been accumulated over the years. We cannot continue the brain drain as it is called. So we have to ensure that our current staff are treated fairly and have first crack at the jobs in the east upon division. I am glad to see that the Interim Commissioner agreed to implement the $4.2 million human resource computer system and to pay their fair share. I am sure this will improve things dramatically. In the area of the investment credits, Mr. Speaker, I am glad to say I was part of the sub-committee of the Standing Committee on Government Operations that made some recommendations.
Reply 9-13(5): Mr. Erasmus' Reply
Item 10: Replies To Budget Address
Page 460
Some Hon. Members
Hear! Hear!.