This is page numbers 481 - 509 of the Hansard for the 13th Assembly, 6th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was nunavut.

Topics

Further Return To Question 243-13(6): Update On Power Corporation Negotiations
Question 243-13(6): Update On Power Corporation Negotiations
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 496

The Speaker

Thank you. Oral questions. Final supplementary, Mr. Miltenberger.

Supplementary To Question 243-13(6): Update On Power Corporation Negotiations
Question 243-13(6): Update On Power Corporation Negotiations
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 496

Michael Miltenberger

Michael Miltenberger Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. If everything proceeds as planned, then nothing changes in terms of the agreement which may be signed. Then on April 1, 2002, there would, in fact, be two corporations. Is that how I understand the Minister's response? Thank you.

Supplementary To Question 243-13(6): Update On Power Corporation Negotiations
Question 243-13(6): Update On Power Corporation Negotiations
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 496

The Speaker

Mr. Dent.

Further Return To Question 243-13(6): Update On Power Corporation Negotiations
Question 243-13(6): Update On Power Corporation Negotiations
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 496

Charles Dent

Charles Dent Yellowknife Frame Lake

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Member is basically correct. Unless some other event happens after the signing of this agreement, and I believe that we are close to finalizing what the agreement would look like, then in three years there would be two completely separate operating power companies. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Further Return To Question 243-13(6): Update On Power Corporation Negotiations
Question 243-13(6): Update On Power Corporation Negotiations
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 496

The Speaker

Oral questions. Mr. Krutko.

Question 244-13(6): Former Employees Under Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 496

David Krutko

David Krutko Mackenzie Delta

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my question is to the Acting Premier. It is regarding the policies of hiring former employees of this government. I would like to ask the Acting Premier about the number of people, which seems to be in the 250 to 300 range, could the Premier tell me if there are statistics kept on how many of these employees have contracts or leases with this government and how many have been appointed to public boards or agencies of this government? Can the Premier give me an idea of how many RFPs have been negotiated with this government? Are there any such statistics kept on former employees to see exactly how many of those positions there are?

Question 244-13(6): Former Employees Under Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 496

The Speaker

Thank you. Can I ask the Member for Mackenzie Delta if he can rephrase his question so that only one question comes out of it?

Question 244-13(6): Former Employees Under Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 496

David Krutko

David Krutko Mackenzie Delta

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. To the Acting Premier, in regard to his knowledge of the process of Cabinet, could he tell me if he knows exactly how many contracts, and the amount of these contracts, there have been given to former senior bureaucrats in this government in regard to contracts such as managerial contracts, leases, RFPs, types of appointments or basically, if there are any negotiated contracts given to former employees of this government? Thank you.

Question 244-13(6): Former Employees Under Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 496

The Speaker

Thank you. I have heard five or six different questions there. I will ask the Member from Mackenzie Delta that he uses his supplementary and his preamble. Would you like to respond, Mr. Arlooktoo?

Return To Question 244-13(6): Former Employees Under Contract
Question 244-13(6): Former Employees Under Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 496

Goo Arlooktoo Baffin South

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My understand is, in talking to the Chair of the Financial Management Board, that there are between 250 and 300 individuals that fall under the post-employment policy and are regarded as senior officers that are under this policy. I believe the Chair of the Financial Management Board has already committed to researching the types of issues that the Member is requesting. I will bring it up with the Chair of the Financial Management Board to ensure that the numbers that the Member requested are provided to him in a timely manner. Thank you.

Return To Question 244-13(6): Former Employees Under Contract
Question 244-13(6): Former Employees Under Contract
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 496

The Speaker

Thank you. Oral questions. Mr. Picco.

Question 245-13(6): Environmental Review Court Decision
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 496

Edward Picco Iqaluit

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the federal government has recently lost a request to stay a ruling on the

environmental reviews that could affect developments of mines in the north and Nunavut, including the diamond mines. I guess, the federal Court of Appeal ruled on November 23rd that the Sun Pine decision, which environmentalists call one of their biggest legal victories, will stand until it is appealed next year. I am wondering, has the Minister for RWED or his department reviewed this serious development? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Question 245-13(6): Environmental Review Court Decision
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 497

The Speaker

The Minister of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Mr. Kakfwi.

Return To Question 245-13(6): Environmental Review Court Decision
Question 245-13(6): Environmental Review Court Decision
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 497

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The department officials do keep track of the court decisions that impact on issues of environment, court cases that arise out of actions taken in jurisdictions such as British Columbia, Ontario and Alberta. When these decisions come out of the courts, we have discussions with the Department of Justice to get advice on the implications and to begin drafting, for the respective Ministers' potential response positions to take in regard to the implications that arise out of those decisions. We do keep track of them. We are not always in the position to give a definitive response because in some cases the implications are somewhat varied and sometimes are appealed. Thank you.

Return To Question 245-13(6): Environmental Review Court Decision
Question 245-13(6): Environmental Review Court Decision
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 497

The Speaker

Oral questions. Supplementary, Mr. Picco.

Supplementary To Question 245-13(6): Environmental Review Court Decision
Question 245-13(6): Environmental Review Court Decision
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 497

Edward Picco Iqaluit

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, industry officials in the mining sector have said that the decision creates uncertainty for billions of dollars in developments from coast to coast to coast. Ottawa and the provinces have said it threatens the hard won intergovernment agreements already in place. I am wondering when the Minister, or his department, would actually have a response to the Sun Pine decision that was made on November 23, 1998, and make that information available to the House and the Members? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Supplementary To Question 245-13(6): Environmental Review Court Decision
Question 245-13(6): Environmental Review Court Decision
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 497

The Speaker

Mr. Kakfwi.

Further Return To Question 245-13(6): Environmental Review Court Decision
Question 245-13(6): Environmental Review Court Decision
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 497

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We will be consulting with the federal government and our colleagues in the respective governments across this country to get an assessment of the implications of this decision and to begin drafting a response in regard to that. We will be quite happy to share it with Members as soon as it is available. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 245-13(6): Environmental Review Court Decision
Question 245-13(6): Environmental Review Court Decision
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 497

The Speaker

Oral questions. Mr. Miltenberger.

Question 246-13(6): Post-employment Policy Administration
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 497

Michael Miltenberger

Michael Miltenberger Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is addressed to the Minister responsible for FMBS, but I will redirect it to the Deputy Premier, in regard to the issue that is being discussed here in terms of senior managers and their post-employment. For most of the regular civil servants, my recollection is that when they resign or step out of office, there is a process they follow. There is a form that gets filled out where a whole number of items are checked off to ensure that all the steps are followed, in terms of equipment and owing money to the government and all of your outstanding administrative items are taken care of.

My question to the Minister would be, is such a relatively simple administrative process in place for senior managers, where, in fact, those kind of departures could be tracked that would seem to be a simple, administrative way that would avoid this kind of particular debate as to what is signed and what is not signed? When somebody at that level leaves office, if it would apply to non-senior civil servants, it would seem to me that maybe something of that nature should exist for senior managers. Thank you.

Question 246-13(6): Post-employment Policy Administration
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 497

The Speaker

The Acting Premier, Mr. Arlooktoo.

Question 246-13(6): Post-employment Policy Administration
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 497

Goo Arlooktoo Baffin South

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I will refer that question to the Chair of the Financial Management Board. Thank you.

Question 246-13(6): Post-employment Policy Administration
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 497

The Speaker

The Chair of the Financial Management Board, Mr. Todd.

Return To Question 246-13(6): Post-employment Policy Administration
Question 246-13(6): Post-employment Policy Administration
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 497

John Todd Keewatin Central

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I apologize for not being in the chair. The question is, is there a form, if you want, where you have to tick off whatever the requirements are with respect to when you leave office. To be quite frank, there are so many policies in this government, I would have check on it with Mr. Voytilla. What I can tell you is, because this subject has become such a large issue, and because there is a public confidence component to it, that I have actually written to all the Ministers today and the deputy ministers, asking them to take a hard look at this and see if we can reassess how we can bring about some public confidence and assurances that all employees, not just the one that has been mentioned, are covered.

We also have got an obligation, as I said yesterday, to the collective, but we have also got an obligation to the individual. We are all aware, any of us that have been in business, know the over, I do not know if overbearing is the right word, but there is an enormous influence in terms of how people do business with government because it really is the primary engine of the economy over the last 20 years. That is changing obviously. Certainly, I recognize the seriousness of the issue and, again, repeat, I will have to check with Mr. Voytilla as to what kind of forms there are. If they are available, I will table them in the House tomorrow so that we can have a look at them. I am working as quickly as I can to bring some confidence and some clarity to how we proceed in the future.

Thank you.

Return To Question 246-13(6): Post-employment Policy Administration
Question 246-13(6): Post-employment Policy Administration
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 498

The Speaker

Oral questions. Supplementary, Mr. Miltenberger.