Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I guess the department still means that, indeed, there is no conflict between the Footprints model as outlined in 1 and 2, which has been accepted by this Assembly, the Keewatin transfer? So I will follow on with a second question and that would be how would such a transfer impact on the 1998/1999 budget? Could the region decide on different priorities for the 1998/1999 year? So as an example, Mr. Chairman, just to clarify my question for the department to the Minister, right now we are approving projects in the main estimates by project name. For example, a new school if it is going to be in Rankin or a tank farm in Arviat or whatever the specific project is, that has been approved in main estimates as specifically for that project. So how would that work then if the Keewatin leadership took on the proposal? Would they receive those monies in a block fund or could they change that priority after it has been passed?
That goes back to my earlier question on the legislation. Again, Mr. Chairman, the Keewatin pilot project may be a good project. I am not saying I am against it, but I am just asking some questions for clarification purposes so maybe the Minister could explain how that could happen, and if the projects are approved today in 1998-1999 capital budget, what happens then with those amounts when they are transferred to the Keewatin mayors. How can that work when they pick different priorities?