Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Mr. Miltenberger. No, I think that is a good point, Mr. Chairman. The Auditor General report is not up before the House and I think that was the point. Maybe in the Auditor General's report, there were some areas we could cover off while the Department of MACA was in front of us. Since we do not have that report to refer back to, we are in a way eliminating our questions in this area on community monitoring and evaluation. The Legislative Assembly directed the Auditor General of Canada last year to do a complete audit on MACA, that was a legislative request of the Assembly. After doing that, maybe they would have picked up on some areas like the early warning system that was in place, like fiscal recovery plans that we could ask questions on. That was my point. Maybe the deputy minister or Minister could let us know, were there any when they responded because they have seen the report. They are privy to it. I am not. Could they tell us if there were any areas of concern? Were there areas where the Auditor General lauded MACA for its good work? There could be pros and cons to a report, I thought good reports, when you are looking at community monitoring and evaluation to share that information with us today. I am not asking for any in-depth review because the report was not in front of us. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Edward Picco on Committee Motion 9-13(5): To Ensure Regular Inspections Of Fire Safety Equipment And Fire Safety Training
In the Legislative Assembly on February 9th, 1998. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 9-13(5): To Ensure Regular Inspections Of Fire Safety Equipment And Fire Safety Training
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
February 8th, 1998
Page 659
Edward Picco Iqaluit
See context to find out what was said next.