Mr. Chairman, I cannot help how it looks to the Member. But I can assure him there is no pork-barreling here. What this suggests, and what I tried to clarify to the committee, was that those communities that identified their need immediately before break-up and within the first four months, their money is listed.
Those communities that need their money later, they will still get their money and we plan to put it into the main estimates, but it is not in the interim appropriation because the communities did not identify their need at the time we were putting interim appropriations together. This included Aklavik.
Since that time, we have had a meeting with the chief. We have had correspondence with the chief of Aklavik. We also had a meeting with Mr. Krutko. We made an effort to put Aklavik's money in here because they did indicate they intend to use it before break-up. That is exactly the explanation for why some communities have their community access funding identified and some do not. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.