Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Could the Minister confirm if that means that in the coming summer, for example, if those deficiencies are recognized, we could get a commitment that we would be able to keep it in there and put it to use as opposed to having it re-allocated? Otherwise, it seems to me there is not much incentive from a local point of view for managers to really save a lot of money in their region if it is going to be taken away from them. It seems to me that the incentive would be to spend it on other things. If you cannot spend it on chip seal, you might as well buy equipment. You might as well buy whatever else you need to beef up your own operation.
Could the Minister clarify the deputy's comments? At this point? What does that mean? Would that mean there would be some comfort or assurance knowing that if the highway's operation around Fort Smith is efficient and realizes some savings, they would be to able put it to use in Fort Smith on that section of road from Sandy Lake to Salt Mountain? Thank you.