Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I suppose, at this point, given the lack of data, that is an assumption, since nobody can speak one way or the other to that. The Minister, on the front page, takes some very big numbers and makes some very broad assumptions; 60 percent in the west, 'x' number here, 'x' number there. All I am suggesting is rather than leave out that big chunk of the population of the government employees, in that chunk of the government's travel budget, they should make the same kind of broad assumption to include them.
You can decide how you will, what that would be, but it is not the same. If you look at their budgets, just pick a figure for the sake of being conservative and assume, like you do here, you round things off. You take big percentages and carve them in two. Do the same, is all I am suggesting, and that is my one big criticism of this tax at this point. Just from a procedural point of view and an equation point of view, there seems to be a chunk missing.
So I am not asking you to go count every health board, I am suggesting you do the same thing you did so far. Take the big percentages, and make some assumptions. If you are going to err on the side of safety, do not overlook that portion of the budget. Thank you.