Overwhelmingly, the committee heard negative criticism and outright opposition rather than support for the hotel room tax. Many of those who spoke at the public hearings appeared to give reluctant or very qualified support for the tax. The support that was given appeared to be based on the assumption that if there was no hotel room tax, there would be no new financial investment in the industry by government.
In Inuvik, Dennis Zimmerman, manager of Inuvialuit Tourism, Arctic Nature Tours, owned by the Inuvialuit Development Corporation advised the committee:
"With respect to the hotel tax, or what is being thrown around now and being called the travel adventure tax, I reluctantly support the tax. No one likes the tax, especially when it is being perceived as coming off the backs of our own industry. We wish the money could have been created from somewhere else. In some respects, we feel we are being held hostage and forced to accept this new revenue which we desperately need." (Committee transcript, p.3)
Vince Brown, chief financial officer for the Inuvik Mackenzie Delta Hotel Group told the committee:
"Every single business, every single person within this town benefits from tourism, even if they are not directly engaged in a tourism type of business. So it follows that perhaps every business should share in the burden of collecting and remitting this tax. Maybe this is because the government might underestimate the effect of a five percent price increase and how the consumer perceives it. It does not seem that much really, but it is enough, believe me, in a lot of cases for somebody to: (a) choose a different place to get lodging, whether it is changing from a hotel to a bed and breakfast; or even to rent an apartment, which may be the case of a lot of long-term lodgings..." (Committee transcript, p.15)
The committee heard some operators question the profile of the type of "tourist" who would be paying the accommodation tax. In Hay River, Don Fergusson (Caribou Inn/ Migrator Inn/ Pelican Rapids Inn, Fort Smith), vice-president of the NWT Hotel Association told the committee:
"According to our Northwest Territories survey*, roughly 50 percent of all travel within the Northwest Territories is Government of the Northwest Territories employees, their agents or contractors and groups and individuals funded directly or indirectly by the Government of the Northwest Territories. Eighty percent of all travellers in the Northwest Territories are residents of the Northwest Territories. We are not taxing tourists, we are taxing ourselves." (Committee transcript, p.17)
*(The survey referred to was undertaken by the NWT Hotel Association.)
The committee heard varying percentages quoted as direct or indirect expenditures for government-related duty travel. The committee does however note that a large portion of the users of accommodation which would be affected by the hotel room tax are either employees of the Government of the Northwest Territories, its agencies or contractors carrying out "duty travel".
The committee heard a number of times from operators that the exemption of bed and breakfast operators with less than 5 rooms jeopardized their competitive position and many of them stated that the tax, if instituted, should be made more broad based and should apply to all bed and breakfast operators.
Committee members are concerned about the lack of buy-in or involvement of the industry stakeholders with respect to the new tourism strategy. Very few operators indicated that they were familiar with or had been asked for their input into the document, Setting a Course for Action: 2001/2002 Business Plan. This document is an annual action plan that is based on a five-year tourism strategy. It is an integrated business plan, which outlines new initiatives for both the NWTAT and the Department of Resources, Wildlife, and Economic Development's (RWED) business plan for tourism activity in 2001/2002.
As with other operators, Beth Phillip, representing the Snowshoe Inn in Fort Providence, advised the committee she had yet to see a copy of the business plan. She told Members:
"It is not so much that I do not think the money generated will benefit tourism, I do. I just do not think I am going to see any of it. That is what makes me mad. I just need it to be equitable. I would love it if those dollars that I put in the pot generate the kind of money that you say the Yukon is, for example. They put all that money into it and they generate a lot of tourism dollars. Well, that would be great, I just do not see how that is going to happen the way it is proposed right now." (Committee transcript, p. 39)
In Yellowknife, Harry Symington, president and chief operating officer of Regency International Hotels (Explorer Hotel and Discovery Inn) and president of the NWT Hotel Association, told the committee about the fragile nature of the hotel industry and his organization's marketing efforts:
"Myself, as a hotelier, I invest over $300,000 in marketing my product, and I market it, I visit China, Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and I went to Korea this year. We spend the money to drive this traffic here, and with no support or help from the government. But I do believe that it is still very fragile, and we are very much in the hands of the operators, that is the tourist operators who come out of Vancouver and these particular countries. At the moment we are dependent on the Japanese, and I would say without any reservations at all, that we have no guarantee for business like this next year. In fact, the competition is so fierce it is unbelievable." (Committee transcript, p. 41)
At this time, Mr. Speaker, I would like to turn it over to Bill Braden, member of the committee.