This is page numbers 597 - 648 of the Hansard for the 14th Assembly, 5th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was chairman.

Topics

Further Return To Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 605

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, as we understand it today, it still has a long way to go. There are proposals and plans in the development. If the scenario is as the honourable Member laid out, yes, there will be two different lines, as far as we understand it at this time. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 605

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Minister. Supplementary, Mr. Roland.

Supplementary To Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 605

Floyd Roland

Floyd Roland Inuvik Boot Lake

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, as well, before a line would be built, is it not in fact true that producers would have to sign up, in the sense of guaranteeing supply to flow through? Thank you.

Supplementary To Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 605

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Roland. The honourable Minister responsible for the Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Mr. Antoine.

Further Return To Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 605

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the idea of a pipeline is to take natural gas down to southern markets and the producers are the ones who own the gas. The producers will be the major player in any type of pipeline scenario. So yes, the producers have to be involved and have to be involved in the decision on how they are going to transport this gas to market.

Further Return To Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 605

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Minister. Final supplementary, Mr. Roland.

Supplementary To Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 605

Floyd Roland

Floyd Roland Inuvik Boot Lake

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Can the Minister inform us as to where the Mackenzie Delta project is at this point? Thank you.

Supplementary To Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 605

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Roland. The honourable Minister responsible for the Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Mr. Antoine.

Further Return To Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 605

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the Mackenzie Valley Producer Group and the Mackenzie Valley Aboriginal Pipeline Corporation, this consortium has completed, as we all know, a feasibility study for the development of onshore gas in the Mackenzie Delta.

On January 7th, this consortium announced they have completed work on their feasibility study and that they are now proceeding with work on the project definition phase. They have a number of timelines they have announced.

This first quarter of this year, 2002, they plan to submit a preliminary information package as well as in the third quarter, towards the third quarter of 2003. They plan on submitting a full pipeline application in about a little over a year. Their plan now is to, in the first quarter of 2005, in three years time, if they receive the project approval they will make final project decisions. By the second quarter of 2008, in about six years time, they hope to have the construction completed and commence production.

This consortium is working now on the pre-development agreement. This is a contractual arrangement that sets out the relationship between the Mackenzie Valley Aboriginal Pipeline Corporation, as well as the future operators of the project. This is what is going on at this point in time. That is all we know for now, Mr. Speaker. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Question 204-14(5): Pipeline Infrastructure Development Options
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 605

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Antoine. Item 6, oral questions. The honourable Member for Deh Cho, Mr. McLeod.

Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

March 12th, 2002

Page 605

Michael McLeod

Michael McLeod Deh Cho

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my question today is directed to the Minister of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development. The Business Program Review Committee has recently completed their review on the single window concept.

I wanted to ask the Minister, how will the single window concept assist in bringing or making additional basic services, such as banking, bookkeeping, accounting, legal and business support, into communities not currently receiving the service? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 605

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. The honourable Minister responsible for the Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Mr. Antoine.

Return To Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 606

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the Business Program Review the honourable Member mentioned was a committee that was set up to review how the different agencies of this government, namely the Business Credit Corporation and the Northwest Territories Development Corporation, as well as Community Futures committees in the regions, how they are working. As a result of that, they have done their work and they have provided the people who are interested, the stakeholders, to look at what they have done and make comment to the department.

We are developing an action plan at this point in time. The review was to look at how we could get these agencies to work closer together and maybe form a single organization to provide the services they are currently doing. As you know, the Business Credit Corporation, like a bank, is a loan agency. The Northwest Territories Development Corporation is an organization that works and has joint ventures and provides those types of services to organizations. Community Futures also provides loans at the community level. The types of services the honourable Member has mentioned are more specific.

I just want to mention that we have started this Bankers Commission that my predecessor kicked off. The first meeting of this Bankers Commission took place last week, as representatives of banks and members of our communities, to start working on this.

If this is the kind of banking services the honourable Member is talking about to help the communities, the Bankers Commission has just started their work. They are telling each other what they are doing and seeing the scope of work required. Perhaps this is one of the areas they should look at, providing these kinds of services.

I am not too sure what the outcome of this meeting was. I have not been briefed on it, but in our preliminary meetings, those subjects, the actual cash flow and the actual type of support that people in the communities need in terms of banking was discussed. I am sure this is an area that we will also be focussing on. Thank you.

Return To Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 606

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Minister. Supplementary, Mr. McLeod.

Supplementary To Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 606

Michael McLeod

Michael McLeod Deh Cho

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the Minister has provided information on the concept of a single window. I did not hear in his answer how it is going to provide any more services than we already have, any additional services.

My next question is regarding business support. I am sure the Minister is aware that an important part of business advice and support is aftercare. If this government is not willing to provide that service, then it should consider whether or not it should even write the cheque for a loan or a contribution. I want to ask the Minister if there will be a commitment from his department to address the lack of aftercare support to small business. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Supplementary To Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 606

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. The honourable Minister responsible for the Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Mr. Antoine.

Further Return To Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 606

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, in the Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, we have the Business Development Fund. We have people within our departments who are there to work with the communities once they start their businesses. If they ask for support, that is what they are supposed to do.

If that is not what they are doing, then I need to know about it and I need to work with our staff, with businesses in the communities and perhaps with the MLAs, to see how we can best provide the services they are supposed to be providing.

As a Member in this House and as a Minister, I always believed that as a government, we are here to provide programs and services to the people in the communities. If that is not happening then I need to know about it. We are looking at it with this department.

There is also the Community Futures organization that has just been put in place within the last couple of years. The idea there is the different businesses that are existing, the smaller businesses in our communities, have been asking for the types of services that perhaps the honourable Member is concerned about, which is once the small businesses start, they may need additional help and dollars to do something and expand and enhance their businesses. The Community Futures organization is there to provide that service. If there is a need to help the smaller businesses become more successful, the Community Futures organizations would have representatives from all the surrounding communities in the region on this board. They are there to provide that service.

We in RWED have taken funding from headquarters and put it into the regions for the Community Futures board to work right at the community level with the people in the community. It is two years old. It is new. There may be a learning experience or problems there, so then we have to look at how we can improve on that. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 606

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Minister. Supplementary, Mr. McLeod. Before I go to Mr. McLeod, I would just like to remind Members of Rule 38. In question period, questions and replies should be as brief and to the point as possible. There is only 60 minutes allowed for question period. Supplementary, Mr. McLeod.

Supplementary To Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 606

Michael McLeod

Michael McLeod Deh Cho

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, up until now, we have had different government agencies that were available to provide loans to our communities. All of these agencies were always considered the lender of last resort. However, there were different agencies that businesses in our communities could approach. With this new concept, it really restricts that.

I would like to ask the Minister, has he considered talking to other outside agencies, such as the Northwest Territories Dene-Metis Development Fund, to see if that is a viable option to the single window concept?

Supplementary To Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 607

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. The honourable Minister responsible for the Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Mr. Antoine.

Further Return To Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 607

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, at this bankers forum, there is a representative from the Dene-Metis Development Loan, Mr. Rocky Simpson. If he is not on that board, then he is very familiar with it. He brought that to our attention, that they are an alternative source of funding for Dene and Metis businesses from the communities.

I am aware of it. I have not really sat down with the officials from the department to see how the department is working with the Dene-Metis Loan Fund. I still need to do that. I would like to let the Member know that I am aware of the Dene-Metis Loan Fund. How it is going to fit into this single window approach with the Business Credit Corporation and the Northwest Territories Development Corporation, I have not asked that question, but I will, following this. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 607

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. Minister. Final supplementary, Mr. McLeod.

Supplementary To Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 607

Michael McLeod

Michael McLeod Deh Cho

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I reviewed the Business Financing Commission membership this morning and I did not see any representation from the Northwest Territories Dene-Metis Development Fund. I would ask if the Minister could confirm that Mr. Rocky Simpson is representing the Northwest Territories Dene-Metis Development Fund. If not, if they could commit to appointing someone. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Supplementary To Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 607

The Speaker

The Speaker Tony Whitford

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. The honourable Minister responsible for the Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development, Mr. Antoine.

Further Return To Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Question 205-14(5): Business Program Review Committee
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 607

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the gentleman who is on the Bankers Commission is Rocky Simpson, who brought this matter to our attention. I do not know if he is on the Dene-Metis Loan Fund or not, but I will confirm that. As to appointing someone to the board, the board is already set up and there are alternates. We will look at that. Thank you.