Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Under contributions to health and social services authorities, just going back to your comment you made earlier in the House today about the discretionary latitude of health authorities to reallocate money within their budget. I'm a little bit concerned about that, because when you talk about having a system that clearly defines the services that are available in any particular community or region, if there are difficulties with staffing in order to carry out certain programs and services, what you're saying then is that that money could be spent on anything else and it kind of undermines the whole basis for the budget process. If health authorities come forward with budgets, there are certain line items in there for certain programs and services. But then when unforeseen things happen such as the inability to staff positions, that money can just be arbitrarily used for something else. I have a problem with that, particularly since health authorities, all except for a couple of them, have been facing deficits. It seems like it might be a deficit recovery. There could be some incentive to not staff positions in order to address deficits. In fact, then the money gets used for something else. It's just kind of a downloading of the costs associated with that service, for example, people having to go to Edmonton or go to Yellowknife to receive those services. Another thing that could occur if it's at the territorial level here, is the example that Ms. Lee gave today, where there's a shortage of nurses in a certain area of service. So people get medevaced, then that doesn't come back to show on their budget, the potential costs of Larga and whatever the Alberta government charges for those services at a different hospital out of territory. So I want to know in your new plans if you have specific measures you're contemplating to address that potential problem with that discretionary latitude. Thank you.