Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I think it's important that we point out that we're not just purchasing equipment, we're purchasing a system. It's not a system where you have disconnected hardware systems. One of the main points supporting this vision of the department, and which I supported, was the fact that it wasn't just a suggestion of $100,000 savings. Both points had to be taken into consideration. The second one is that you had one supplier doing the installation, the troubleshooting and the warranty, and that was an important part of this decision. It's not just trying to save $100,000. The department is well aware of the government's policies and practices. As a matter of fact, what has been suggested to industry to do, that is break down larger contracts to allow smaller companies to be able to bid on them, is something that was suggested by the government. I agree with the member that if we say we recommend to industry to do this, then we follow the same procedure. But I believe the department did take into consideration this policy, and we did try to follow the policy to the letter. It's just that at this point in time it's no longer where it's part of a BIP issue, it is more of a contracting issue, and the department feels that this was the best way to go. Thank you.
Vince Steen on Bill 3: Appropriation Act, 2003-2004
In the Legislative Assembly on March 10th, 2003. See this statement in context.
Bill 3: Appropriation Act, 2003-2004
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
March 9th, 2003
Page 641
See context to find out what was said next.