Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the Member is making a number of assumptions; assumptions that there are going to be no locums, assumptions that there's going to be some terrible visitation that's going to require a fleet of medevac planes to deal with a situation that may or may not occur at some point in the future if all these other assumptions in fact bear out. I'm dealing with the reality that we do have locums, we do have a contract with a viable plane company, a flight company. In regard to the e-mail that she makes reference to, Mr. Speaker, I check my e-mail every day, but if the Member would share a copy of that with me to refresh my memory, I'll look at it. I've been reading e-mails in a fairly steady stream over the last few days, just paying attention to what's happening. But the Member makes a very specific reference to an e-mail and I don't want to discuss it in the House, but I'd be happy to look at it.
Michael Miltenberger on Question 299-14(6): Availability Of Medevac Aircraft
In the Legislative Assembly on June 10th, 2003. See this statement in context.
Further Return To Question 299-14(6): Availability Of Medevac Aircraft
Question 299-14(6): Availability Of Medevac Aircraft
Revert To Item 6: Oral Questions
June 9th, 2003
Page 922
See context to find out what was said next.