This is page numbers 259 - 292 of the Hansard for the 15th Assembly, 4th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was communities.

Topics

Further Return To Question 121-15(4): Access To Northern Strategy Funds
Question 121-15(4): Access To Northern Strategy Funds
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

Robert C. McLeod

Robert C. McLeod Inuvik Twin Lakes

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Going back to my Member's statement today on the pipeline, I have a couple of questions for Mr. Handley. I read, with interest, some of the comments he made in the paper about some of the demands being excessive. Does he believe that this could possibly kill the project? Thank you.

Further Return To Question 121-15(4): Access To Northern Strategy Funds
Question 121-15(4): Access To Northern Strategy Funds
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. That's kind of asking the Minister for an opinion, so I would have to rule that question out of order. If you want to rephrase your question, Mr. McLeod.

Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

Robert C. McLeod

Robert C. McLeod Inuvik Twin Lakes

Rephrase it? Okay. Let me try that again.

---Laughter

What is the GNWT's position on this? Does the GNWT believe that this could possibly hurt or kill the project? Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I think I did it again.

Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. I will ask the Minister to respond on what the GNWT's position is on this. The honourable Premier, Mr. Handley.

Return To Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

Joe Handley

Joe Handley Weledeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I certainly don't feel like the Maytag repairman anymore. Mr. Speaker, our government's position is that the pipeline will happen. It will take place. But the negotiations are proceeding. Every day, I am in contact with some of the parties, all of the parties, depending on what is happening, and monitoring what is going on. This is very tough negotiating. There are $7 billion plus just in the expenses, plus huge amounts of revenue if it goes ahead. It is a huge amount of revenue for us as a government, for the federal government, for the producers, for the aboriginal organizations and governments. So it is very tough negotiating. But our view is that this pipeline will go ahead. Any time people make demands that are put forward as ultimatums, that tends to threaten things. I don't think it serves a really good purpose. We believe that this is good for the North and will happen. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Return To Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. Handley. The time for oral questions has expired; however, I will allow the Member to have supplementary questions. Mr. McLeod.

Supplementary To Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

Robert C. McLeod

Robert C. McLeod Inuvik Twin Lakes

Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. Thanks to the Premier for that. Let me try another one. I know the Premier has been working hard trying to get all parties together here to get this thing going. Is there anything more that this government can be doing? Are we a serious player in some of these negotiations? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Supplementary To Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Mr. Handley.

Further Return To Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

Joe Handley

Joe Handley Weledeh

Mr. Speaker, we are a very serious player in this project. It will make a tremendous difference to communities along the valley. I have travelled to many of the communities. I have seen the situation that people are living in where there is unemployment and poor housing and so on. This is an opportunity that we...

Further Return To Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

An Hon. Member

No roads.

Further Return To Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

Joe Handley

Joe Handley Weledeh

No roads. We don't want to let this one go by. Mr. Speaker, this project is too important for us to sit by. We are major players in it. Some things we are not directly involved in. For example, on the financial considerations that the industry is dealing with, the federal government is directly involved. But we are being kept informed all the time and we will watch that closely because, in the long run, we are the ones as northerners that will end up paying a large part of that bill. Yes, we are watching all the way along. We are a significant player here. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. Handley. Supplementary, Mr. McLeod.

Supplementary To Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

Robert C. McLeod

Robert C. McLeod Inuvik Twin Lakes

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I agree with the Premier that this project is important to the valley. With all of these demands being made from all of the parties involved, is this holding up the talks with Ottawa on this resource revenue sharing? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Supplementary To Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Mr. Handley.

Further Return To Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

Joe Handley

Joe Handley Weledeh

Mr. Speaker, no, there isn't a direct relationship between our negotiations on devolution and resource revenue sharing and the pipeline. But we do realize that if there is a pipeline, it means huge financial benefits that will generate to the North and to ourselves as a government. If there is no pipeline, then we have lost a great opportunity, in our view. But in terms of direct relationship, no. I am sure, though, as our negotiators, the federal negotiators and the aboriginal negotiators get to the table, then the information on the value of the pipeline is certainly on everybody's mind. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Further Return To Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 277

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. Handley. The honourable Member for Kam Lake, Mr. Ramsay.

Further Return To Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 278

David Ramsay

David Ramsay Kam Lake

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to seek unanimous consent to return to item 5 on today's Order Paper. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Question 122-15(4): Government Position On Future Of Pipeline
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 278

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

The Member is seeking unanimous consent to return to item 5, recognition of visitors in the gallery. Are there any nays? There are no nays. We will return to Item 5, recognition of visitors in the gallery. Mr. Ramsay.

Revert To Item 5: Recognition Of Visitors In The Gallery
Revert To Item 5: Recognition Of Visitors In The Gallery

October 13th, 2005

Page 278

David Ramsay

David Ramsay Kam Lake

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I would like to recognize Mr. Brian Dejardins, with the Northwest Territories Association of Communities, who is with us here today.

---Applause

Revert To Item 5: Recognition Of Visitors In The Gallery
Revert To Item 5: Recognition Of Visitors In The Gallery

Page 278

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. Ramsay. Item 5, recognition of visitors in the gallery. The honourable Member for Monfwi, Mr. Lafferty.

Revert To Item 5: Recognition Of Visitors In The Gallery
Revert To Item 5: Recognition Of Visitors In The Gallery

Page 278

Jackson Lafferty

Jackson Lafferty North Slave

Mahsi, Mr. Speaker. I would just like to express my personal thanks to Sarah Coey-Simpson who is here as a Page this week. She is going home tomorrow, so I would like to say thank you. Mahsi.

---Applause

Revert To Item 5: Recognition Of Visitors In The Gallery
Revert To Item 5: Recognition Of Visitors In The Gallery

Page 278

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. Lafferty. Item 5, recognition of visitors in the gallery. Item 7, written questions. The honourable Member for Range Lake, Ms. Lee.

Written Question 8-15(4): Access To Special Needs Funding
Item 7: Written Questions

Page 278

Sandy Lee

Sandy Lee Range Lake

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Minister of Education, Culture and Employment.

  1. How much money, on a year-by-year basis, has been allocated for special needs funding for the last five years for the NWT as a whole?
  2. What is the breakdown each DEA/DEC received for this funding for special needs over the same time period on a yearly basis?
  3. What are the criteria set out to determine how students with special needs qualify for special needs support?
  4. What is the process used to determine who among our student population have special needs and require additional support?
  5. Please provide all ministerial directives issued in this regard.
  6. What is the number of students who require special needs support in our school system at the current time?

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Written Question 8-15(4): Access To Special Needs Funding
Item 7: Written Questions

Page 278

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Ms. Lee. Item 7, written questions. The honourable Member for Sahtu, Mr. Yakeleya.

Written Question 9-15(4): NWT Emergency Measures
Item 7: Written Questions

Page 278

Norman Yakeleya

Norman Yakeleya Sahtu

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my question is to the Minister of Municipal and Community Affairs.

  1. What departments are involved in the Emergency Measures Act?
  2. Who in the Department of Municipal and Community Affairs takes the lead role?
  3. How often are the emergency measures policy guidelines updated?
  4. How many times does the staff meet with the communities?
  5. How are communities categorized in the emergency measures?
  6. Are there any territory-wide emergency measure action plans to deal with territory-wide issues?

Thank you.