Thank you. My reference to the replicating of the structures really spoke to the senior management. I
am going by the organizational charts in ITI and ENR in this budget as compared to the last year's budget, which I have here. Really, if you look at RWED and ITR now, it is almost an exact replica except for the fact there are shared services directors. Anyway, we don't want to get into that debate. I understand that there are lots of people employed to do ENR positions that are not indicated in the organizational chart. I think it really speaks to, if we keep...Every dollar we spend here is a statement about our priority. Surely anybody could justify creating 23 positions because we absolutely must have to do it. I am sure Minister Bell could convince us of that. But in the larger scheme of things, after we've done everything we can, we need to take care of our own in house. How does the money get left over to do other things? For the people who are looking at us from out there, the people in Nahanni Butte who are looking for a new indoor centre, can they understand that Yellowknife needed to create these two departments because they have conflicting mandates, and they just had to create 23 new jobs? There was just no other way about it. Not only that, we are going to spend $1.7 million every year extra; about the same amount of money that it takes to build one new indoor facility every year. Where do we answer to that? I don't think that the problem is entirely on the Minister. I need to ask the whole government to look at the departmental redistribution. Public Works has three superintendents. Transportation has four superintendents. ITR is going to have five superintendents for one department, and then ENR is going to have five superintendents, too. But, technically, you could argue that these positions have less work now because they have been divided in half. So why couldn't there have been a new reducing of other senior management positions? The Minister and I could argue about that. I know this was not done without care. I understand that, but from where I sit, I have to stay on the bird's eye view and from that critical analysis, I believe that we have fallen down. Thank you.