Thank you, Madam Speaker. I have met with the company, Diavik specifically, a couple of times recently about this. We've had discussions around training for the most part because that really is the answer here, is to make sure that programs like ASEP are up and running, and are able to provide training for people who are currently not employed and who want to be employed, but I think that's the answer. As we stated earlier, Diavik is complying with the terms of the socioeconomic agreement. Their explanation for having to do this is one of a very hot economy in western Canada and the fact that 30 percent of their workforce is coming from the South is highly sought after for southern projects. They're trying to make sure that there's not a disincentive for them to come north. It's quite possible that as these people come north and get more familiar with life in the North, that they'll in fact want to relocate here, and I don't think that we can discount that possibility either, Madam Speaker.
So, much of this is hypothetical, but I would say to the Member the Member is aware of people who are specifically coming to his office and suggesting that they're now going to leave the South, this is the window they've been looking for because the $10,000 in northern allowance payments they get from the company was really now something they were going to leave on the table and take the $3,000 travel benefit, and that was the difference. But I'm prepared to sit down and talk to the Member and committee about that. So if the Member has some specific names or incidences, we can sit down and discuss that. Thank you.