Mr. Speaker, part of the reason I believe Hay River was getting more money is because there were certain parts of the corridor that were annexed and taken into Hay River. At the time, the government recognized those additional costs because of the corridor annexation and put money into the subsidy to reflect that. Is that not why Hay River was getting more money? What has changed? Hay River still has to take care of the corridor. Thank you.
Jane Groenewegen on Question 284-15(5): Water And Sewage Subsidy Reduction
In the Legislative Assembly on February 9th, 2007. See this statement in context.
Supplementary To Question 284-15(5): Water And Sewage Subsidy Reduction
Question 284-15(5): Water And Sewage Subsidy Reduction
Item 6: Oral Questions
February 8th, 2007
Page 756
See context to find out what was said next.