Mr. Speaker, I would respectfully disagree that there wasn’t enough work or research done. It may not meet the regular standards that the Member had in mind, but we did enough, in our opinion, to move forward with a model. We decided to pick a model that already had a track record in the North that looked to hit a lot of what we would see as key points and abilities to build, to integrate service, to be able to streamline governance, streamline finance and administration, look at the ability to do better work on the case management approach. Based on those factors, a decision was made to advance the initial phase with this particular model. Thank you.
Michael Miltenberger on Question 153-16(3): Analysis To Support Proposed Model For Board Reform
In the Legislative Assembly on February 18th, 2009. See this statement in context.
Question 153-16(3): Analysis To Support Proposed Model For Board Reform
Oral Questions
February 17th, 2009
See context to find out what was said next.