Mr. Speaker, this process was stretched out with a long timeline to 2010-11, recognizing that there was going to be a lot of work to get us from where we start to where we may end up with the issue of board reform. We are not precluding those types of discussions at this point. We took the first step to say, here’s a model we think has applicability and we have been doing the work to get us to April that will give all the information for us collectively to talk about and look at to decide on next steps. If it is not that model, not that approach, then what approach and if the broader discussion is as a Legislature, we want to collectively put off the table the whole issue of board reform, then come April, I suppose that would be a discussion we could have in this House today during the time that we are going to be sitting here. Thank you.
Michael Miltenberger on Question 153-16(3): Analysis To Support Proposed Model For Board Reform
In the Legislative Assembly on February 18th, 2009. See this statement in context.
Question 153-16(3): Analysis To Support Proposed Model For Board Reform
Oral Questions
February 17th, 2009
See context to find out what was said next.