This is page numbers 3523 - 3560 of the Hansard for the 16th Assembly, 4th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was communities.

Question 105-16(4): Animal Protection Legislation
Oral Questions

Thebacha

Michael Miltenberger

Michael Miltenberger Government House Leader

As the Member noted, when the House puts its mind to issues of legislation, be it the Petroleum Products Act or in other legislation like the Family Violence Act, things can move relatively quickly. It would depend on the advice we get from the Legislative committee, if there’s a piece of legislation that can be adapted and modified to the Northwest Territories without rewriting right from scratch. But I think it’s an issue that if the will of the House is such, that could be looked at. Thank you.

Question 105-16(4): Animal Protection Legislation
Oral Questions

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. Miltenberger. Final supplementary, Mr. Ramsay.

Question 105-16(4): Animal Protection Legislation
Oral Questions

David Ramsay

David Ramsay Kam Lake

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I appreciate the Minister’s response. The Yukon had a similar occurrence with some animal cruelty, which led them to bring in an act two and a half years ago; the Animal Cruelty Act in the Yukon. We don’t have to look that far and wide to find a piece of legislation, I think, that we could take a look at here in the Northwest Territories. Again, I want to ask the Minister, I know the Justice Minister said this in March, but can we please get another piece of legislation and get moving on this sooner than two years? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Question 105-16(4): Animal Protection Legislation
Oral Questions

Thebacha

Michael Miltenberger

Michael Miltenberger Government House Leader

I will be talking about this issue with my Cabinet colleagues tomorrow morning and we’ll look at what’s possible and is there an ability to use existing legislation from other jurisdictions modified to the northern reality and not have to do this from scratch to see what’s possible. Thank you.

Question 105-16(4): Animal Protection Legislation
Oral Questions

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. Miltenberger. The honourable Member for Mackenzie Delta, Mr. Krutko.

Question 106-16(4): GNWT Support For The Fur Trade
Oral Questions

David Krutko

David Krutko Mackenzie Delta

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My questions are directed to the Minister of ITI, Mr. McLeod. Mr. Speaker, in regard to the importance of the harvesting industry in the Northwest Territories and the important role that it played in developing the Northwest Territories going back to the mid-1800s, I think it’s important to realize that it is still a very good part of our communities and the subsistence dependence that people have is to still trap and still harvest as a means of sustaining themselves.

I’d like to ask the Minister in regard to this government’s programs that they have, we have programs in regard to supporting the secondary industry for diamond polishing, we have funds available for the tourism industry, we have funds available in regard to APG and supporting their initiatives in regard to a pipeline, we have oil and

gas money in regard to providing that service and also we just learned that the outfitters businesses are receiving some $300,000 in regard to the Barren Ground Outfitters. I’d just like to ask the Minister to explain exactly what are we doing as a government to support the trapping industry in the Northwest Territories?

Question 106-16(4): GNWT Support For The Fur Trade
Oral Questions

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. Krutko. The honourable Minister responsible for Industry, Tourism and Investment, Mr. Bob McLeod.

Question 106-16(4): GNWT Support For The Fur Trade
Oral Questions

Bob McLeod

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Our government has been involved with providing support to the trapping industry for many years and when I count up all the programs that we have, we’re providing approximately $1.75 million that we make available to assist trappers, and that’s not counting the $14.250 million that we’ve made available over the past some years since division as part of the Western Harvesters Assistance Program to allow harvesters to purchase new equipment. Thank you.

Question 106-16(4): GNWT Support For The Fur Trade
Oral Questions

David Krutko

David Krutko Mackenzie Delta

I know in the past, through economic development through our EDA agreement with the federal government, we have programs such as special Arctic grants where people were able to apply for grants to get snowmobiles, equipment, we have the Grubstake Program, which was there to assist people basically to stake claims and whatnot in the Northwest Territories. I’d just like to ask the Minister, in light of the economic dollars we’re seeing from the federal government, have we looked at the possibility of implementing these types of programs which worked in the past and we’re there to support harvesters like we do with the fishing industry, the diamond industry and the other sectors of our economies so that people can really see the benefit of sustaining this industry?

Question 106-16(4): GNWT Support For The Fur Trade
Oral Questions

Bob McLeod

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South

The federal government recently announced the CanNor program. It’s headquartered in Iqaluit and it has district offices in the Northwest Territories and the Yukon. Also they do have programs that are operated out of there. The Member is correct; in the past there was ARDA programs, special ARDA programs, and when I questioned the federal government about was there ever any potential for ARDA programs coming back, they said there were already ARDA programs in existence and the funding is going to aboriginal governments. Although instead of ARDA it’s ARHDA funding. So as far as I understand, each of the aboriginal governments are receiving ARHDA money. Thank you.

Question 106-16(4): GNWT Support For The Fur Trade
Oral Questions

David Krutko

David Krutko Mackenzie Delta

Again, this government is doling out money to the outfitters industry because of so-called impacts, because of the numbers dropping in caribou. I mean, the same herd is going to affect the people that depend on subsistence harvesting, especially the aboriginal people that depend on

those herds for subsistence. You have to offer them an alternative for hunting or harvesting caribou. One of the areas that you can seriously make a difference in is the trapping industry so that those people can realize that if we support them in that sector, that they’ll be able to continue to sustain the lifestyle that can sustain them, they’re able to bring in the furs and have an industry in harvesting and expanding the processing of those products in the Northwest Territories. So, again, I’d like to ask the Minister, have you looked at the implications from the harvesters’ perspective, not the outfitters, and what are we doing to realizing these decisions made in regard to not harvesting the Barren Ground caribou herd or whatever? It’s going to have more of an impact on aboriginal harvesters than it will to the outfitting industry.

Question 106-16(4): GNWT Support For The Fur Trade
Oral Questions

Bob McLeod

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South

We have looked at those sectors. The Barren Ground Outfitters probably provide something in the neighbourhood of four to five million dollars in direct economic benefits to the Northwest Territories. Similarly, we looked at trapping and it’s very difficult to quantify other than the actual return, plus we estimate that if you had to go to the stores to buy country foods that the harvester provides, you’d probably be looking at something in the neighbourhood of $20 million. So we think that both sectors do provide economic benefits to the Northwest Territories and we try to continue that they do survive. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Question 106-16(4): GNWT Support For The Fur Trade
Oral Questions

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Final, short supplementary, Mr. Krutko.

Question 106-16(4): GNWT Support For The Fur Trade
Oral Questions

David Krutko

David Krutko Mackenzie Delta

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I find it kind of hard to hear the Minister’s comments regarding not being able to quantify the importance of the trapping industry in the Northwest Territories but we’re doling out money to every industry that’s from outside the Northwest Territories.

Mr. Speaker, my last question in regard to the importance of harvesting to people in our small rural and remote communities. People still have to sustain themselves by some sort, unless this government’s willing to dole out more money for income support and put everybody in our communities on income support and make that an industry, because that’s exactly where this government is going and not realizing the importance of this industry on rural and remote communities. So I’d like to ask the Minister again, exactly why is this government not taking the importance of the trapping industry in the Northwest Territories like we do the diamond industry?

Question 106-16(4): GNWT Support For The Fur Trade
Oral Questions

Bob McLeod

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South

I like to think that trapping is a success story. We are contributing $1.75 million in assistance for 800 trappers, and I think it’s a very important way to maintain a way of life.

The diamond industry and about 1,200 miners that work and it contributes significant dollars to our

GDP. The diamond mines and the mining industry have resulted in the Northwest Territories having the highest GDP for the past 10 years. So it’s very difficult to compare a billion dollar industry to a maybe one or two million dollar industry. But we are contributing to try to make all sectors successful in the Northwest Territories. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Question 106-16(4): GNWT Support For The Fur Trade
Oral Questions

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. The honourable Member for Weledeh, Mr. Bromley.

Question 107-16(4): Proposed Taxation Initiatives
Oral Questions

October 27th, 2009

Bob Bromley

Bob Bromley Weledeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Following up on my Member’s statement, my questions are for the Minister of Finance. Yesterday the Premier was asked about the current state of devolution negotiations and gave answers describing their status. Completion of a deal will take some time, and meanwhile, the revenues owed to our citizens for the sale of our resources go uncollected. Many Members have called for a resource tax as a desirable interim measure. Will the Minister commit to bringing forward a proposal for the increase of revenues through resource rents as part of his package of recommendations in the next budget? Thank you.

Question 107-16(4): Proposed Taxation Initiatives
Oral Questions

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. Bromley. Honourable Minister responsible for Finance, Mr. Miltenberger.

Question 107-16(4): Proposed Taxation Initiatives
Oral Questions

Thebacha

Michael Miltenberger

Michael Miltenberger Minister of Finance

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We are committed to bringing forward a proposal for a heritage fund. We know that from some quarters there is an interest in a resource tax. We have indicated that we’re looking at tax shifting at this point, given that we’re still in a recession that while there are some weak signs of recovery, it’s not clear that we’re on the way out and that we don’t have anything further to worry about. But we have committed, as a result of our roundtable, to do work on a resource tax, and look at the feedback we’ve received and put a discussion paper out there so that we could initiate that policy discussion to see. Keeping in mind the last time, about a year ago, when we talked about revenue options and looked at creating $30 million in revenue and we talked about a whole host of things -- resource taxes, hotel taxes, road tolls, all these types of things -- there was almost unanimous denunciation in the House for any contemplation of raising taxes and the cost of living. So we will come forward with a discussion paper and we are going to move on the heritage fund. Thank you.

Question 107-16(4): Proposed Taxation Initiatives
Oral Questions

Bob Bromley

Bob Bromley Weledeh

Very good news to hear about the heritage fund intent. I’m happy to hear that some work is being done on the resource tax. Of course, times change and, as I say, there has been quite a shift, as well, in our thinking on the resource tax that, of course, would not affect the cost of living.

The tax shifting is of interest, though. Studies show that when taxes are lowered for low and middle income people, the money is spent priming the economy and improving standards of living. The studies also show that high income earners who get tax cuts spend their money on imported goods or they put it into savings, providing only limited benefit to the community. Will the Minister commit to including a lowering of income taxes for lower and possibly middle income earners in his revenue recommendations? Mahsi.

Question 107-16(4): Proposed Taxation Initiatives
Oral Questions

Thebacha

Michael Miltenberger

Michael Miltenberger Minister of Finance

We would be prepared to look at all of the suggestions. I am not prepared to negotiate the contents of the upcoming budget in the House. At this point, there have been lots of recommendations made. We are looking at trying to maintain tax levels, so we are looking at things like tax shifting, recognizing, as well, it’s a delicate balancing act.

The other concern is if you continue to raise taxes at the high income level as well, you have trouble attracting people when they look at the tax regime and where is the best place for them to come and provide their services. We recognize the pressures at both ends and we will try to find that appropriate balance. Thank you.

Question 107-16(4): Proposed Taxation Initiatives
Oral Questions

Bob Bromley

Bob Bromley Weledeh

Thanks again for those comments. I recognize it’s difficult to commit at this point and I am happy to see work is being done at this point. I hope we do go forward with that opportunity.

It’s shocking, of course, that nearly 20 percent of our earned income in the NWT economy is paid to people who don’t pay taxes in the NWT. I recognize that the MOU between the government and the diamond mines is working on that to base workers here in the North and that there is some effort to look at immigration to sort of help in an indirect way, however, tools do exist that can help us recover some of the loss in this area. What measures is the Minister contemplating and hopefully proposing to capture some of these escaping revenues right now? Thank you.

Question 107-16(4): Proposed Taxation Initiatives
Oral Questions

Thebacha

Michael Miltenberger

Michael Miltenberger Minister of Finance

As the Minister from ITI has pointed out, there were meetings held with the mines -- BHP, Diavik and De Beers -- about the MOU. One of the best ways is going to be what the mines have committed to doing, which is limiting the incentives for flying south. The pickup points are only going to be in the North, keeping in mind, then, that it’s going to be the responsibility of communities that are going to be possibly places where these folks will stay. They have to make sure that they have housing available should these folks that fly in say that now they are prepared to live in the North, be it Yellowknife, Hay River, Fort Smith, Fort Providence, any community. We need housing available to hold up our end of the deal.

One of the things that we have looked at in the past that we have not moved on, of course, is a further increase to the payroll tax. That’s another option that’s there. It has, we think, fairly limited success given how much administration there is and all the requirements to refund or for people to have to claim back, but it’s still an option that is there available to us as well. Thank you.

Question 107-16(4): Proposed Taxation Initiatives
Oral Questions

The Speaker

The Speaker Paul Delorey

Thank you, Mr. Miltenberger. Final supplementary, Mr. Bromley.

Question 107-16(4): Proposed Taxation Initiatives
Oral Questions

Bob Bromley

Bob Bromley Weledeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I suppose the departure tax might be in line with some of the discussion that the Minister is having with the mines and so on to try to capture the entrance and exit of people from the Territories as they come to and fro from work. Will the Minister commit to leading the charge for ensuring that these measures are put together in an integrative and complementary way so we can enjoy the fullest range of benefits from them when we do put them in place? Will he recognize their relationship to each other and ensure that they take advantage of that opportunity? Mahsi.