Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I guess I would like to change course just a tad. I’ve expressed a concern that we are probably going to see a reduction in our revenues over the next year to two years and I think the federal government, with a $60 billion deficit, is likely to take our grants and reduce them and I anticipate that’s probably going to start happening next year. So I would like to know from the Minister whether or not the program review office is taking that kind of an approach to reducing our expenditures. Are they considering that our revenues will probably be down and what are they doing in regard to that kind of a mentality?
Debates of Jan. 29th, 2010
This is page numbers 3807 - 3836 of the Hansard for the 16th Assembly, 4th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was work.
Topics
Question 216-16(4): Program Review Office
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Floyd Roland Inuvik Boot Lake
Thank you. The work that we do on an annual basis around business planning and budget development takes into consideration our revenue sources, the fluctuation in those revenue sources, whether it’s own source or transfers from the federal government. We’ve had a commitment by the Prime Minister and Minister Flaherty from the federal government that the transfer agreements that have been signed will be honoured. That does not mean that dollars outside of those transfer agreements that are funds that are identified to be sunsetted will be reinvested in and those are the areas that we’re all across the country paying attention to see what impacts may flow down the line across our Territory. But the revenues, the planning all takes into consideration the flow and I’m sure Minister Miltenberger can give much detail on that as we prepare to go into the budget process itself. Thank you.
Question 216-16(4): Program Review Office
Oral Questions (Reversion)
Question 217-16(4): Impacts Of Diamond Mines On Caribou Conservation Measures
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Norman Yakeleya Sahtu
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I want to ask some questions to the Minister of ENR, Mr. Miltenberger, in regard to the study on the Bathurst caribou herd. I want to ask the Minister has his department, along with other independent consultants, done an in-depth study on the impacts of the diamond mines that were opened up in the North part of this region in terms of seeing if that had any impacts on the migration of or the breeding or anything that has to do with the caribou?
Question 217-16(4): Impacts Of Diamond Mines On Caribou Conservation Measures
Oral Questions (Reversion)
Question 217-16(4): Impacts Of Diamond Mines On Caribou Conservation Measures
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Michael Miltenberger Thebacha
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Work has been done to get the most accurate survey results we can for the Bathurst. Each diamond mine is required, by their operating licensing work that they commit to, to look at the impact that they have and sort of try to minimize any disruption to the wildlife in the area, including the caribou. That would take into play BHP, Diavik, as well as Snap Lake. Thank you.
Question 217-16(4): Impacts Of Diamond Mines On Caribou Conservation Measures
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Norman Yakeleya Sahtu
Thank you. Does the department have a before and after report as to the impacts of the caribou? There are thousands of vehicles that go up to the diamond mines each year. They are doing a lot of blasting in those areas and there’s certainly lots of disruption in terms of the natural lifestyle of the caribou. Has the Minister shared that with this House? I haven’t seen a report in terms of the possible impacts of this diamond mine on the caribou.
Question 217-16(4): Impacts Of Diamond Mines On Caribou Conservation Measures
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Michael Miltenberger Thebacha
What we know with considerable certainty is from 2006 to 2009 the Bathurst herd numbers diminished from 120,000 to the neighbourhood of 30,000. We know, as well, with some considerable certainty that there’s a considerable number of variables, climate change, resource development, hunting, ease of access...(inaudible)...species, changes to climate, permafrost, those type of things that have all combined to have an impact on the herds, not only the Bathurst but herds across the Northwest Territories. Thank you.
Question 217-16(4): Impacts Of Diamond Mines On Caribou Conservation Measures
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Norman Yakeleya Sahtu
Mr. Miltenberger listed a number of factors to the decline of the caribou. I would like to know about the impact on the caribou. Does the Minister have any information in terms of the calving of the caribou? Has this had an impact on the calving of caribou?
Question 217-16(4): Impacts Of Diamond Mines On Caribou Conservation Measures
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Michael Miltenberger Thebacha
We’ve accumulated since 2005 a considerable amount of information on nearly every herd now, with the possible exemption of the Ahiak, that looks on cow/calf ratio, bull/cow ratio, general health of the herd, calf survival, all those types of things. We
gave an overview to committee earlier this week. If there is a wish for more detailed survey information, we’d be willing to provide that. Thank you.
Question 217-16(4): Impacts Of Diamond Mines On Caribou Conservation Measures
Oral Questions (Reversion)
Question 217-16(4): Impacts Of Diamond Mines On Caribou Conservation Measures
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Norman Yakeleya Sahtu
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We certainly did receive a briefing from the Minister and I hope the Minister would make that briefing public so we could have the public look at it. Does he have a record of all the outfitters in this area that will be impacted or have been impacted in regards to this caribou herd and the impact of the outfitters taking the prize bulls in terms of doing part of their business? Can the Minister share that also with the Members?
Question 217-16(4): Impacts Of Diamond Mines On Caribou Conservation Measures
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Michael Miltenberger Thebacha
All the information that we shared with committee has been shared across the North, around all the involved and affected aboriginal governments, stakeholders, when it comes to the Bathurst herd. But the work done, the work that was overviewed, by the ENR staff, that’s all information that we make the point of sharing because it’s such important valuable information for making decisions.
We also have, between ourselves and ITI, a very good idea of all the outfitters and the tags that they’ve used and that information as well, I believe, has been shared. But if the Member would like us to provide that again, we would do that. Thank you.
Question 217-16(4): Impacts Of Diamond Mines On Caribou Conservation Measures
Oral Questions (Reversion)
Question 218-16(4): Support For Avalon Ventures Thor Lake Project
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I didn’t know that question period was going to be extended today, but I had so many questions after my question to the Minister of ITI after I sat down that I have to ask more questions. His answers actually gave me more questions. I am still shaking my head, because when you look at the royalties issue and the federal jurisdiction on oil, gas and minerals, if that was an argument not to help find power supplied to keep secondary processing over the rare earth minerals in the Northwest Territories, then we wouldn’t put any money into the pipeline, we wouldn’t put any money into the diamond mines. I mean, I don’t even know how much, if you had to add up how much money this government has spent to try and get benefits from the diamond mines, the efforts that they made, because it still benefits, it’s still employment, it’s still industry, economy. It’s still all those things in our communities. So that thing about federal jurisdiction and royalties is still stuck in my mind here.
This is not a good answer. We’ve got an opportunity here. Of course, we can’t compete with
what Saskatchewan might offer in terms of power, but if the processing is done in the Northwest Territories versus Saskatchewan, there’s the whole savings of hauling all that product, hauling all that ore, someplace else for processing. I mean, that has to come into the play of the discussions and the negotiations.
But, Mr. Speaker, this is a mine that has a potential life. I mean the diamond mines. I have no issues with this government supporting industry of any kind; the non-renewable resource sector, please don’t misunderstand. I have no issue with this government supporting industry of any kind, the non-renewable resource sector. Please don’t misunderstand; I have no problem with money being spent in it. But now here’s an opportunity for some of the communities that have been on the periphery of some of these big... The pipeline’s not going to flow through Hay River. The diamond mines are not going to be in Hay River and Fort Resolution. We need something; I’m sorry. Part of the country. I need to hurry up here. Given the projected life of the rare earth minerals, the opportunity there, I hope that the Government of the Northwest Territories can have a say in whether or not we can provide economic power to that processing plant. Would the Minister agree with me?
Question 218-16(4): Support For Avalon Ventures Thor Lake Project
Oral Questions (Reversion)

The Speaker Paul Delorey
The honourable Minister responsible for Industry, Tourism and Investment, Mr. Bob McLeod.
Question 218-16(4): Support For Avalon Ventures Thor Lake Project
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I think I agree with most of what the Member said, but I would like to point out that the comparisons with the diamond mines, the reason we focus on value added is the fact that that’s the only way we can get benefits from development. The royalties go to the federal government, so if we want any benefits, we focus on the value added. With the diamond mines, through the environmental assessment process, we got the regulators to agree with what we were doing to provide for value added. I expect we would do the same thing with the Avalon project once it goes for regulatory review.
Now, what has been talked about with Avalon is they are looking, in addition to the mine, that they would have a hydromet facility in the Pine Point area. That would provide for something in the neighbourhood of 50 jobs plus a whole bunch of investments. My understanding is the communities of Fort Resolution, Hay River, and Fort Smith have already given their support to this project. What we need is a business case. We need to know what the benefits are and with that we can come forward and get the necessary approvals so that we can support it.
In order to diversify our economy I think it would be great if we could have a project where we could sell
rare earth minerals and lithium and all of these kinds of minerals. Certainly I’m very pleased that the Member is supportive of our government investing in those kinds of things. When it comes time to identify resources, that would be very helpful.
Question 218-16(4): Support For Avalon Ventures Thor Lake Project
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
Avalon Ventures’ Thor Lake Project environmental assessments, a lot of that work has already been done. It happened very quietly, but much of that work has already been done. I think it’s up to our government to invest the resources. When we see an opportunity, we have to be proactive. We have to create that business case for why we should be supporting this.
Going back to the previous set of questions, the Minister answered that in terms of the excess power generated at the Taltson now, the Minister said something. I want to know who has jurisdiction over it. Is it NTPC? Has it been turned over to some other entity? I want to know who has jurisdiction over that excess power.
And here’s another thing. The Minister said something about we can’t hold power or reserve power for something that might come to fruition. Well, if we’re holding that six megawatts for the diamond mines, isn’t that exactly what we’re doing? I didn’t really understand that and I’d like clarity on that.
Question 218-16(4): Support For Avalon Ventures Thor Lake Project
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South
The NWT Power Corporation owns and generates the power. What I was talking about was, based on the current schedules, it’s basically who comes first.
Question 218-16(4): Support For Avalon Ventures Thor Lake Project
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
What is being done currently today, as we speak, to be proactive as a government to look at the potential economic benefits of the Avalon Ventures play at Thor Lake to have this Territory recognize the maximum benefits from that project? What is this government doing right now to put together an assessment of those benefits?
Question 218-16(4): Support For Avalon Ventures Thor Lake Project
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South
We’ve been involved in a number of meetings with Avalon. We have sent a representative to a conference in Washington on the benefits of rare earth minerals. We are looking at their energy requirements. We will be co-hosting a conference with CanNor to discuss the value-added opportunities.
So rare earth minerals are something that’s fairly new. We don’t know a lot about all the different value added, but we will be working with the federal government to identify value-added opportunities and, of course, we’ll be working with Avalon as well.
Question 218-16(4): Support For Avalon Ventures Thor Lake Project
Oral Questions (Reversion)
Question 218-16(4): Support For Avalon Ventures Thor Lake Project
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I think that we need to take a very similar look at the rare earth minerals as we did with the
diamonds. They weren’t mining diamonds in Alberta or Saskatchewan at the time that we got into it here. I don’t think that they will find a deposit such as has been identified here in the Northwest Territories in any other jurisdiction any time soon that I’m aware of. So we have a unique opportunity of something that is located in the Northwest Territories that I would like this Minister to commit to the House that we will place the same emphasis and priority on maximizing benefits to Northerners from that resource as we have on diamonds and other natural resources in the Northwest Territories.
Question 218-16(4): Support For Avalon Ventures Thor Lake Project
Oral Questions (Reversion)

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South
I’m quite prepared to commit to that because we do that as a matter of course. Certainly this is an area where we want to see development proceed and certainly we’ll work very hard to make this happen.
Question 218-16(4): Support For Avalon Ventures Thor Lake Project
Oral Questions (Reversion)