Mr. Chairman, a couple of things. First of all, I think any time there’s a question about whether we’re doing our job properly or the project is being referred to as not doing due diligence in certain areas, it’s of concern to us and at the same time if there are issues being raised to the Member or any other Members, we want to hear about it. We’d certainly welcome a sit down briefing and we’d really appreciate to see what he’s discussing or what’s being brought to his attention.
Again, we are concerned that somebody involved in the project who is a professional would take this route rather than come to us or anybody involved with the project directly. Having said that, our involvement on the project in the first year was quite limited in terms of having people on site. It was managed by the Deh Cho Bridge Corporation and we, as a government, did not have a regular scheduled visit with any of our staff. We had people go onside and do quick inspections, look at reports and things of that nature.
In the second year, this past year, we changed our methodology. We no longer used the project management board. We inserted ourselves in different aspects of the construction season. We had people on site on a regular basis; weekly if not at least biweekly.
So there are two different scenarios and two different ways we dealt with this project, which differed from the first year to the second year. We could, I guess, compile that information at some point to provide to the Member on the actual days. We don’t have that information right with us today.