Thank you, Madam Chair. The actual money that was put towards renovating and updating and retrofitting government facilities was substantially less than the $15 million a year overall that we tried to put to the various alternative energy priorities. If you look at the actual number, which Mr. Guy could probably provide, the savings that we are realizing and the payback times are actually quite significant. The payback times are short. The savings for the
amount of money we’ve spent I think are fairly good. If we get an adjustment to our borrowing limit, then we will be collectively, as I’ve indicated in other forums, having a collective discussion about the amount of room and the type of resources that we want to be able to collectively put to bear if we get the ability to borrow for strategic infrastructure requirements.
I would suggest that we’ve made a very significant commitment in the last Assembly of almost $60 million carrying over to this year. That is one area where there is a lot of momentum that we would hate to lose. I would suggest that, yes, we would have that discussion, should we be successful.