Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I can recollect back over the years when Colville Lake… They moved out to Colville Lake because they wanted a traditional community
with minimal trappings of civilization. Clearly, as we have been there over the years, there has been a growing concern about the fact of having some of those amenities. We are working on that.
There is, in fact – and I will ask Mr. Guy to confirm this – money and work being set up to deal with the actual infrastructure requirements to improve on the honey bucket system and to put in those types of amenities, but there is also another piece that has to be done before those can be made operational, and that is the lagoon and the disposal part of the process.
The issue of a new school, of course, will have to go into the capital planning process, keeping in mind at this juncture we are going to be looking at $75 million a year for the next number of years unless there is some type of change to our borrowing limit. Once again, if there is a bump-up to that, then we will have another discussion. There will be enormous pent up demand that we know is already there, red flag projects and projects that are already on the list as the Member knows, like the long-term care facility in Norman Wells.
So I will ask Mr. Guy maybe if he could speak to some of the particulars in regard to the Member’s impassioned plea about the schools and the health centre facilities. Thank you.