I can take that at face value, but how do you account for 9 percent vacancies and just say that all the money is being used up? I mean, the money must be going somewhere. I mean, when you add up 9 percent, which is just under $6 million, there are vacancies so that position, whatever the vacancy is attributed to specifically, that money has got to go somewhere, and that’s the money I’m asking about. What we’re hearing is it’s just being gobbled up through other human resource needs. That may be the technical fact, but how it gets there is kind of the issue I’m
getting at. I hear that we have just under $6 million left on the table and yet it’s mysteriously being used through human resource things that I’m not seeing the direct connection to. That’s the connection I’m trying to get here, because quite frankly I mean, if a direct…
Quite frankly, what I’m seeing here is that, for example, if a director’s position was empty, I mean, you just don’t fill it with a casual that day. That’s an example, for goodness sakes, so we don’t take that on as an actual. You have the position vacancies. I don’t. The point being is in a director’s salary, I mean, where does it go? Oh, my goodness, you have more time at the jail and more time in the courts and money may be spent in those areas? Probably, but I view it as money that is specifically passed by this Legislature should be going to those particular allocations, and I’m trying to sort of put my finger on some of that.