Debates of Oct. 27th, 2014
This is page numbers 4961 – 5000 of the Hansard for the 17th Assembly, 5th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was communities.
Topics
- Oral Questions
- Prayer
- Minister's Statement 104-17(5): Government Of The Northwest Territories Taking A More Prominent Role On The National Scene
- Minister's Statement 105-17(5): Forest Management Agreements
- Supporting A Local Mushroom Harvest
- Junior Kindergarten Implementation
- Services Required In Colville Lake
- Nursing Services In Tsiigehtchic
- NWT Coroner Service Annual Report
- Establishing A Culture Of Workers’ Safety
- Implementation Of Northwest Territories Wellness Court
- Supporting A Local Mushroom Harvest
- Question 440-17(5): Recommendations Of The NWT Chief Coroner
- Question 441-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
- Question 442-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
- Question 443-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
- Question 444-17(5): Supporting A Local Mushroom Harvest
- Question 445-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
- Question 446-17(5): Colville Lake Emergency Services
- Question 447-17(5): Establishing A Culture Of Safety Within The GNWT
- Question 448-17(5); Nursing Services In Tsiigehtchic
- Question 449-17(5): Northwest Territories Wellness Court
- Question 450-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
- Recognition of Visitors in the Gallery (Reversion)
- Tabled Document 149-17(5): 2013-2014 Status Of Women Council Of The NWT Annual Report
- Tabled Document 150-17(5): Growing Forward 2 – A Summary Report Of The Small Scale Foods Program 2013-14
- Tabled Document 151-17(5): Action 2013-000272 – R. V. GNWT (Dot) And Grizzly Marine Services Ltd., 2014 NWTtc 17: Reasons For Sentence
- Motion 29-17(5): Extended Care Facilities, Defeated
- Recorded Vote
- Bill 33: An Act To Amend The Elections And Plebiscites Act, No. 2
- Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
- Report of Committee of the Whole
- Orders of the Day
Question 441-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
Thank you for that long list of symposiums and forums and meetings that the department engaged in, but consultation is a two-way street. Sure, the department may have been telling educators and telling people who run
daycares and telling people that are in this line of work what their vision of Junior Kindergarten was. I understand that we were telling them. I’d like to ask the Minister, what were they telling us? Thank you.
Question 441-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions

Jackson Lafferty Monfwi
Mahsi. Part of the engagement with the educators, we want to hear their perspective, as well, because they’re the ones who are delivering Junior Kindergarten to our communities, the 23 communities that we are currently delivering Junior Kindergarten and hearing their perspectives. Just recently I met with my department. Why couldn’t we have a survey done in the communities, as well, because we’re into three months of Junior Kindergarten being delivered in our communities and we haven’t heard much from the 23 communities. So, I as the Minister responsible want to hear their perspectives. Not only that, but from the regional perspective and also Yellowknife. So, I’m looking forward to those types of discussions coming my way. Mahsi.
Question 441-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions
Question 441-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. It’s interesting that the department and the Minister are not hearing what the concerns are because we, as MLAs, are certainly hearing them and the responses that we are getting are completely understandable. We hear from people. I know this is supposed to be a short supplementary – I could stand here all day on this topic – so let me just go and ask the Minister a final question.
How much analysis went into the cost of adding Junior Kindergarten to existing schools on a community-by-community basis? Because when we, as the Standing Committee on Social Programs, heard about this initiative, we thought, wow, where’s the money, a question that we never got an answer to and neither have the DEAs and DECs.
I’d like to know, where is the analysis on the cost of something like this? I say the money is not there and that’s one more reason why it’s not going to succeed. Thank you.
Question 441-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions

Jackson Lafferty Monfwi
When we first decided to roll out the Junior Kindergarten, obviously there was a discussion at the board level. I met with the board chairs back in 2013, in October, and introduced the JK. At that time we were talking about the cost factor, how much it was going to cost us. Obviously, throughout the time, we talked about how we were going to subsidize the JK as we move forward. We said, well, there’s $150 million going to the school boards already, how can we best utilize that funding to get the best results? Those are the discussions that we’ve had with the 23 communities that will be delivering Junior Kindergarten, working with the board chairs as well.
So, there has been a lot of analysis done on this particular JK delivery, and we just learned from Quebec, as well, that the universal daycare is not really working well for them. Now they’re turning their focus on junior kindergarten for the province of Quebec. So, we are learning best practices from other jurisdictions as well.
Question 441-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions
Question 442-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions

Robert Bouchard Hay River North
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Today my question will be for the Premier of the Northwest Territories, and it’s related to Junior Kindergarten and how it relates to consensus government.
Can the Premier indicate to me how we deal with a topic like this, that’s been before this House for over a year, talking about the funding requirements. How does consensus government deal with this issue, one issue that keeps repeating itself with no results? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Question 442-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions
Question 442-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’d be very pleased to try to explain how we got there from here. As the Member may know, in the previous Assembly we had a Program Review Office, which still exists, and I was glad to hear one of the Members say that as a government we have to adhere to our own legislation, and I think that’s what we have to do.
The Program Review Office reviewed the education system. The Program Review Office pointed out to us that we were not adhering to our own legislation; we were overfunding education by over $17 million a year. It was pointed out that we should invest more in early childhood development, and that’s what this government has done. We have invested in Junior Kindergarten. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Question 442-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions

Robert Bouchard Hay River North
I’m just wondering about the concern, and I see the concern is not Junior Kindergarten and the fact of whether it’s needed or not.
How do we deal with this consensus when we’re talking about how it’s being rolled out? The concern is from different communities, from different leaders throughout the Territories saying that this program is not being rolled out properly when there’s other organizations and other programs, such as the Head Start program, that are being overrun by this Junior Kindergarten program. How do we deal with that in consensus government?
Question 442-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South
Aboriginal Head Start program is a federal program and it’s federally funded, and I don’t see us interfering in any way
with Aboriginal Head Start. Where there are Aboriginal Head Start programs where Junior Kindergarten is being introduced, we’re working it out so that they can coexist.
Question 442-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions

Robert Bouchard Hay River North
I understand the situation, but I understand that these kids are being removed and they’re being put into the public system. Who wouldn’t take that on? It’s a free program, but it’s a program within some of the communities that’s not necessarily needed. I guess the rollout is the question.
How can we change the rollout going forward in consensus government?
Question 442-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South
In consensus government we pride ourselves in being open and transparent and working things out. We’ve just rolled out Junior Kindergarten. It’s only been in place for three months in communities where they have nothing. They don’t even have daycare. So, as we do in consensus government, we are surveying the program, how it’s working, and we will be reviewing it as early as the next session of this Assembly. Thank you.
Question 442-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions
Question 442-17(5): Implementation Of Junior Kindergarten
Oral Questions

Robert Bouchard Hay River North
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I understand that Cabinet is proud of this program and I understand that Junior Kindergarten is going to be a good thing for some of the small communities that don’t have anything. The question that I have is, it’s being rolled out now, it’s being implemented. Some of these organizations, some of these small communities already know those concerns.
Will the Premier commit to doing some sort of general meeting on Junior Kindergarten with all those people that are being affected, a Junior Kindergarten charrette let’s call it, will the Premier commit to that?
Help us improve OpenNWT
Please only include contact information if you would like to hear back.