Thank you, Mr. Speaker. On June 26 and 27, 2012, a Northern Premiers Forum was held in Iqaluit where northern Premiers called on the federal government to increase the northern residents deduction and index it against the cost of living in the territories to help ensure that taxpayers in northern Canada pay a similar proportion of their income in federal tax as taxpayers in southern Canada. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

I do appreciate the Premier indicating that, but I was asking about the quantified economic benefits. I don’t think we heard that answer.

Has the Premier examined the possible adjustment in benefits of the northern residents deduction to northern employers in our workforce? If so, what are the results? Thank you.

The northern Premiers’ chair

wrote to the three territorial Finance Ministers requesting that the Finance Ministers work together to develop an approach and a rationale for engaging the federal government to seek an increase in the northern residents deduction. They asked for a progress report by October 31, 2012, and a final report by January 31, 2013. So on October 31, 2012, on behalf of the three territorial Finance Ministers, Nunavut’s Finance Minister provided the northern Premiers with a report and a possible work plan. The report noted that increasing the northern residents deduction would decrease personal income tax revenue for federal, territorial and some provincial governments and would only benefit high income northern taxpayers. In addition, support of six provinces whose northern residents also received the northern residents deduction would need to be reconfirmed if the Northwest Territories wished to pursue this initiative further. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Again, it’s painfully clear that

you’ve had meetings with some of our northern colleagues. There have been some reports not knowing whether or not it had a full impact to the NWT economy, but the Premier did formally write to all federal election leaders and although the letter did not cite northern deduction per se, only one federal leader replied specific to this deduction.

Can the Premier formally indicate, aside from this single letter writing campaign that we have heard during this federal election, what formal collaborative lobbying efforts are in place to secure an increase to northern residents deductions as part of the Population Growth Strategy? Thank you.

On the basis of the final report, the three Premiers decided not to pursue it at that time because it recognizes that the northern residents deduction reduces individual taxable income but also decreases the amount of tax that we collect. So, I think it would be something that if this Assembly felt it was important and that it would benefit other high income residents, northern residents, I suggest it would be put forward as part of the transition planning. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Final, short supplementary, Mr. Dolynny.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We’ve

heard from many constituents that this is not dealing with just high income earners. Many people across the Northwest Territories felt that the northern residents deduction has lacked any vigour or rigor to deal with the issues of the day. They always say the squeaky wheel gets the grease.

To ensure there are no blurred lines here, what is the Premier prepared to do during this fiscal year and federal election to get the Government of Canada to increase northern residents deduction? Thank you.

As I indicated, the Tax Collection Agreement between the Northwest Territories

and

Canada

requires

that

both

jurisdictions use the same definition of taxable income. So, a northern residents deduction increase would reduce federal and territorial personal income tax revenues. For example, in 2008 with the increase of the NRD to the maximum deduction at $6,022.50, the cost to the GNWT is about $800,000.

We are prepared, if this Assembly supports this, to make it part of the transitional process and also to write to the federal government, recognizing that they are in the middle of an election. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Time for oral questions has expired. Item 9, written questions. Item 10, returns to written questions. Item 11, replies to opening address. Item 12, petitions. Item 13, reports of committees on the review of bills. Mr. Moses.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I wish to report to the Assembly that the Standing Committee on Social Programs has reviewed Bill 56, Miscellaneous Statute Law Amendment Act; Bill 62, An Act to Amend the Coroners Act; Bill 63, An Act to Amend the Victims of Crime Act; Bill 64, An Act to Amend the Co-operative Associations Act, and wishes to report that Bills 56, 62, 63 and 64 are now ready for consideration in Committee of the Whole.

Further, Mr. Speaker, the Standing Committee on Social Programs has reviewed Bill 59, Estate Administration Law Amendment Act, and would like to report that Bill 59 is ready for consideration in Committee of the Whole as amended and reprinted. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. Moses. Mr. Hawkins.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I wish to report to the Assembly that the Standing Committee on Economic Development and Infrastructure has reviewed the following bills: Bill 45, An Act to Amend the Workers’ Compensation Act; Bill 49, An Act to Amend the Deh Cho Bridge Act; Bill 60, An Act to Amend the Motor Vehicles Act, No. 2; Bill 61, An Act to Amend the Public Airports Act; and Bill 65, An Act to Amend the Safety Act.

Mr. Speaker, the standing committee wishes to report that Bills 49, 60 and 61 are ready for consideration in Committee of the Whole and Bills 45 and 65 are amended and reprinted and ready for consideration in Committee of the Whole. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. Hawkins. Item 14, tabling of documents. Mr. Miltenberger.

Mr. Speaker, I wish to table the following two documents, entitled “Northwest Territorial Capital Estimates, 2016-2017” and “GNWT Response to CR 16-17(5): Report on the Review of the 2013-

2014 Public Accounts.”

Thank you, Mr. Miltenberger. Mr. R.C. McLeod.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I wish to table the following four documents, entitled “Follow-up Letter for OQ 774-17(5): Agricultural Strategy;” “Follow-up Letter for OQ 872-17(5): Status on Cantung Mine;” “Follow-up Letter for OQ 818- 17(5): Track and Field Fa

cility for Fort Simpson;” and

“Follow-up Letter for OQ 875-17(5): 2015 NGO Stabilization Fund.” Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. Mr. Beaulieu.

Mahsi cho, Mr. Speaker. I wish to table the following two documents, entitled “Follow-up Letter for OQ 839-17(5): Innovative GNWT Recruitment Process;” and “Follow-up Letter for OQ 848-17(5): Human Resources Open Houses.” Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. Beaulieu. Mr. Ramsay.

–

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I wish to table the following nine documents, entitled “Oil and Gas Engagement Strategy Report – Pathways to Petroleum Development;” a “Follow-up Letter for OQ 762-17(5): Supports for Sewing and Beading Craftwork;” a “Follow-up Letter for OQ 831- 17(5): Business Incentive Policy;” a “Follow-up Letter for OQ 833-17(5): Morel Mushroom Harvesting Concerns;” a “Follow-up Letter for OQ 835-17(5): Morel Mushroom Harvest;” a “Follow-up Letter for OQ 855-17(5): Responsible Energy Exploration and Development;” a “Follow-up Letter for OQ 864-17(5):

Water Safety and Hydraulic Fracturing;” a “Follow- up

Letter for OQ 840-17(5): On-the-Land

Rehabilitation Programs;” and a “Follow-up Letter for OQ 868-17(5): RCMP

Presence in Tsiigehtchic.”

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. Ramsay. Mr. Abernethy.

Thank you, Mr. Abernethy. Mr. Lafferty.