Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Just a couple questions. Let us go back to Highway No. 3 just for a moment. I recognize that there are a number of issues with the road as it relates to permafrost degradation and settling issues. All of us know that, once upon a time, that road was a gravel road. Maybe it was a gravel road for a good reason.
If we know that we are going to have to sit and wait for this road to settle out for an undetermined time, has the department done any work as it relates to cost benefit versus chipsealing it or going back to gravel and managing dust control with calcium and packing? It would seem to me that operating and maintenance costs would be considerably less. You could get to parts of the road that have degradation much quicker and repair it. It just seems to me that we would be able to have a much smoother ride. Is there a reason why we would not be considering at least maybe even a section, the worst sections, going back to gravel? Thank you, Mr. Chair.