This is page numbers 565 - 633 of the Hansard for the 12th Assembly, 4th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was chairman.

Topics

Motion 4-12(4): Independent Review Of Triple Designation Of River Ridge Facility, Carried
Item 15: Motions

Page 588

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my motion today calls for an independent review of the Minister's decision to designate the young offenders' facility in Fort Smith as a triple designated facility. The sole motivation, Mr. Speaker, that I have in bringing on this motion is my concern for the safety of my constituents. Mr. Speaker, I would like to address, however, one issue up front. Mr. Speaker, there have been some comments which I believe to be unfair comments that my motivation on this issue is affected by the fact that my sister is the manager of the River Ridge Facility. Mr. Speaker, my sister does work at the facility, in fact, she worked for the department for many years before I became an MLA, and she'll undoubtedly work there for many years after I'm finished my political life. Mr. Speaker, I want to make it very clear to all the Members of the Assembly that the fact that my sister works at the River Ridge Facility has no bearing whatsoever on my concerns about this situation. If anything, I feel I've been tougher on this issue and my sister, than I might otherwise have been because of my relationship.

In addition, Mr. Speaker, I've also sought legal advice as to whether I am in a conflict of interest and have been advised that I am not. Nonetheless, I wish to state clearly for the record, the relationship to the manager of the facility and the fact that this relationship has no impact on the position that I'm taking here today.

Mr. Speaker, as I stated on numerous occasions in this House, I am concerned that the decision of the River Ridge facility as a triple designated facility, poses a safety risk to my constituents. The facility is now designated to hold three types of young offenders. Those sentenced to a term of open custody, those sentenced to a term of secure custody and those young offenders who are held on remand, pending a trial.

These young offenders have committed very different offences. Mr. Speaker, those offenders, who are sentenced to secure custody, have committed the most serious of offences under the federal Criminal Code. The federal Young Offenders' Act provides, in section 24(1)(3), "A young offender shall only be sentenced to secure custody, if the offence is one for which an adult could be imprisoned for five years or more, or the young offender has already breached a probation order, or the young offender has been convicted of escaping from prison, or the young offender has a previous criminal record." The category of secure custody is the most serious custodial decision that can be made by a sentencing court.

By contrast, those offenders who are first-time offenders, or commit relatively minor crimes under the Criminal Code or our territorial laws, may be sentenced to open custody. The federal Young Offenders' Act defines open custody as custody in community residential centres, group homes or child care institutions, or a forest or wilderness camp -- such as my honourable colleague for Iqaluit has mentioned -- or any other place or facility.

The definition of open custody suggests that a facility is quite different from the type of facility where you would keep young offenders convicted of the most serious crimes. This is my concern, Mr. Speaker. The fact that a relatively innocent young offender, convicted of a minor criminal or territorial offence and sentenced to open custody, might be influenced in a negative way by a young offender with a much more criminal record, who has been sentenced to a term of secure custody.

Since the facility was designated as a triple designated facility, there have been serious incidents, which cast doubt on the Minister's decision. There has been a hostage taking, where one of my constituents was held hostage at gunpoint by two young offenders. There have been staff members at the facility beaten up and held captive by young offenders, who then escaped from the facility.

The Minister's response to this was tabling a report where he called the triple designation of the facility, "A remarkable success." Mr. Speaker, I do not believe that a hostage taking and assault on staff constitutes a success.

Mr. Speaker, I wish to also make it very clear that I am not alone in my concerns. My constituents are concerned. I have talked with many of my constituents, who have expressed their concerns over their safety and the safety of all residents of Fort Smith. I have tabled letters in this House expressing the concerns of the Fort Smith Metis Local and the NWT Metis Nation. Everyone I have talked to on this issue is concerned and I want the Minister to know, and I don't appreciate his remarks, that it is only the concern of the Member for Thebacha. It is the concern of my constituents in Thebacha.

I believe that the recent incident at the River Ridge facility calls for an independent review conducted by an official from outside the Northwest Territories. With all due respect to the Minister of Justice and his staff, Mr. Speaker, I do not believe that the report tabled by the Minister is objective or is impartial.

Mr. Speaker, on April 1, the Minister of Justice stated, and I quote from Hansard on page 1366, "I will be very pleased to provide a written report in October, to show the Members that things are going very well and will continue to go very well, as planned." How can any report provided to this House, be viewed as an objective, impartial report on a situation where the Minister has previously stated that the report will continue to go very well?

Mr. Speaker, this motion is not calling for a change in the Minister's decision to designate the facility as a triple designated facility. All I, and my constituents, are asking for is to call for an independent review of his decision, so we may all be assured that the issues pertaining to public safety have been fairly, objectively and thoroughly addressed.

Mr. Speaker, I ask the Members for their support on this motion that will attempt to address, particularly, the area of safety. Thank you.

Motion 4-12(4): Independent Review Of Triple Designation Of River Ridge Facility, Carried
Item 15: Motions

Page 589

The Speaker

Thank you, Mrs. Marie-Jewell. The seconder to the motion, Mr. Gargan. To the motion. Minister Kakfwi.

Motion 4-12(4): Independent Review Of Triple Designation Of River Ridge Facility, Carried
Item 15: Motions

Page 589

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Speaker, with regard to the motion, I had followed what I thought was the wish of the good Member for Thebacha following the winter session, regarding her request for a review of the decision. I thought the views of the staff, including management of the triple designated facility, would be more than adequate to say whether the triple designation can work.

The report I tabled, shows the correctional staff, the management of the River Ridge facility, in conjunction with other senior managers in corrections, feel triple designation is manageable. It keeps public security as a very high priority. We also take into account the welfare and interests of the young offenders, who need special care and guidance. We take into account that some of them are in remand, some in closed custody and open custody. It is the view of the staff and management that it is a manageable arrangement. It is demonstrated by other jurisdictions and facilities in Canada. So that report was done with that in mind.

I must say there cannot be a sole concern in this issue. I don't want my concerns to be trivialized either. The public concern for safety is a major concern for everyone and we have to do what we can to assure the public that their interests are taken into account. But, their interest alone, is not the only concern to be dealt with. By legislation, we also have to take into account the interest of the young offenders. As employers, we also have to take into account the welfare, well-being and treatment of the staff and management of this facility. There are a number of sides to this issue and this is what I have tried to consider.

I should point out to Members that the hostage taking, that happened this summer, was done by open custody young offenders, not secure custody young offenders. It was while young offenders were out doing some gardening, under supervision in the community of Fort Smith, that they decided to bolt and escape. This is always present whenever you have people who are confined.

There are three triple designated facilities in the Northwest Territories. There is one in Iqaluit, one in Hay River and one in Fort Smith. I think Members should take into account that we should not be spending public money to look at one facility. The motion should be supported, but it should be clear that, if we're going to spend public money to look at these facilities then I would want to look at more than just the concerns for public safety in triple designated facilities.

First of all, we can agree that someone from the south, some southern expert -- as much as we might abhor it -- would probably provide some objectivity in this regard. If the Member for Thebacha has some suggestions of objective southern people with the professional expertise and management experience to conduct such a review, I would be very happy to take the suggestions. I would want to look at the physical design of the facilities that we have triple designated to see if they are compatible and, if changes need to be made, what is the substance of change that would be required.

We would want to look at the present staffing levels, not only the numbers of staff assigned, for instance, to night shift, but also to look at the type of physical and mental qualifications that guards in these types of facilities should have. I think that has been an issue that has been raised by management and by other people in asking whether or not something can be done to review this. We would look at the qualifications of the staff as well.

We would look at the procedures that are used in these facilities. How they are developed and drafted by the department, how they are passed on to management, how the management passes them on to the staff, how regularly they are reviewed, and how they are monitored, and whether or not changes or additions should be made in this regard. We would look at the response that is given on how incidents should be handled in these facilities, not because they are triple designated, but because they are facilities that hold young offenders, who are confined, against their will, by courts, and there is a high probability that they will try to escape at some time or another.

We need to know and be clear about the procedures that are used when escapes and major incidents happen, and what additional recommendations can be made there. The financial implications of all changes and recommendations that are made should be attached to such a review. I must say that I have no hesitation in submitting the facilities to this type of scrutiny. As I have said, I have great confidence in the managers of these facilities, and I believe they will successfully use the results of such a review, to further improve the quality of programs for young offenders.

I hope that this process, if it is agreed to by Members, and the direction that is given by this motion, will provide assurances to the public that we are taking an extra measure, besides the regular reviews and audits that we have with these facilities. We will try to keep the costs down. I know public inquiries and reviews can become very costly. I will be looking forward to this process to get under way so that an outside view of our facilities will come up with suggestions and recommendations that will not only enhance the credibility of these facilities and the staff that run them, but also restore shaken public confidence, at least in one community.

---Applause

Motion 4-12(4): Independent Review Of Triple Designation Of River Ridge Facility, Carried
Item 15: Motions

Page 590

The Speaker

Thank you, Mr. Kakfwi. To the motion. You would like to have your final statement, Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Motion 4-12(4): Independent Review Of Triple Designation Of River Ridge Facility, Carried
Item 15: Motions

Page 590

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you. I thank the Minister for his comments and his viewpoint. I did want to indicate to this House that the purpose of my motion was to read "an independent review," not an inquiry or something intended to be a costly review. Basically, the intention is to ask the Minister to ask to borrow one of his provincial counterpart's staff, with expertise in this field, to do the review. Therefore, it would not mean extraordinary cost to the government. As I initially said, we are asking to have a decision to triple designate impartially looked at. With that, I would like to ask for a recorded vote, Mr. Speaker. Thank you.

Motion 4-12(4): Independent Review Of Triple Designation Of River Ridge Facility, Carried
Item 15: Motions

Page 590

The Speaker

Thank you, Mrs. Marie-Jewell. That concludes the debate. A recorded vote has been requested. All those in favour, please rise.

Recorded Vote

Motion 4-12(4): Independent Review Of Triple Designation Of River Ridge Facility, Carried
Item 15: Motions

Page 590

Clerk Of The House Mr. David Hamilton

Mrs. Marie-Jewell, Mr. Gargan, Mr. Koe, Mr. Ng., Mr. Lewis, Mr. Whitford, Mr. Ningark, Mr. Arvaluk, Mr. Pudlat.

Motion 4-12(4): Independent Review Of Triple Designation Of River Ridge Facility, Carried
Item 15: Motions

Page 590

The Speaker

All those opposed, please rise. All those abstaining, please rise.

Motion 4-12(4): Independent Review Of Triple Designation Of River Ridge Facility, Carried
Item 15: Motions

Page 590

Clerk Of The House Mr. David Hamilton

Ms. Mike, Mr. Pollard, Mr. Kakfwi, Mr. Morin, Mr. Todd, Mr. Nerysoo.

Motion 4-12(4): Independent Review Of Triple Designation Of River Ridge Facility, Carried
Item 15: Motions

Page 590

The Speaker

The official count is nine votes voting for, zero votes voting against and six votes abstaining. The motion is carried.

---Carried

---Applause

Motion 8-12(4), Road Construction through Wood Buffalo National Park, Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

December 8th, 1993

Page 590

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

WHEREAS, a road through Wood Buffalo National Park would promote a stronger economic base for Fort Smith and the surrounding Northwest Territories communities;

AND WHEREAS, a road connecting with the Alberta Highway 56 network would shorten the driving distance to the park, as well as promote tourism;

AND WHEREAS, the development of a transportation system through the north will enhance the north's long-term economic strategy;

AND WHEREAS, currently, the heavy equipment operators' program at Thebacha campus is developing the opening of a winter road to Fort Chipewyan;

NOW THEREFORE I MOVE, seconded by the honourable Member for Yellowknife South, that this Legislative Assembly express its support for the construction and successful negotiations of a road through Wood Buffalo National Park, from Fort Smith to Fort Vermilion. Thank you.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

Page 590

The Speaker

Thank you, Mrs. Marie-Jewell. The motion is in order. To the motion. Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

Page 591

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this opportunity to be able to address an initiative -- and I believe it is an exciting initiative -- that can be accomplished by this government, with their assistance. Mr. Speaker, since I have been a Member for six years, I have many times indicated that an all-weather road to the south from Fort Smith is required.

I did want to indicate that this road system, as all Members know, Fort Smith is right on the Alberta border, right in the Northwest Territories. However, was a road through Wood Buffalo Park, as I have said, back in 1958. This road has not been, for some reason or another, maintained. As a result, there has been a substantial amount of overgrowth in the past twenty years. Therefore, the resources to be able to keep this road open have not been available.

Mr. Speaker, I certainly believe that, not only will it increase and promote tourism, but it will allow for another economic base for the benefit of all territorial residents. Any type of road to resources or to the north, any type of transportation infrastructure we get in allows for the north to benefit in many different ways, whether it be through cheaper rates with respect to any type of items that come up north. It certainly will benefit many of the communities. I don't want to speak too long on the motion, Mr. Speaker. It is just that I basically want to indicate to the Members that this particular road is in the management plan of Wood Buffalo National Park. This road is identified. However, we basically need a mechanism to put in place the completion of the road that really requires 72 miles of a cut line to be cleared. Since it will, no doubt, shorten the distance where people from Fort Smith go south, it will also encourage people from the south to come up north.

We all know that Fort Smith is one of the pretty communities in the territories. There is no doubt that it will encourage and increase our tourism for the north. We all know that tourism dollars add to our economy. I believe that it encourages an economic base, it allows for a transportation infrastructure to be built. I believe that it is a good initiative to look at.

Mr. Speaker, as I have said, since Arctic College has been working with the road to Fort Chipewyan, this type of initiative to build a road to Fort Vermilion is a reality. I do want Members to know that, in speaking to the Prime Minister, he has made a commitment to many of his close liberal friends from Fort Smith, in giving whatever assistance he can provide to look at a winter road. I certainly know that Thebacha campus, the heavy equipment program, is more than capable of building this type of road. I certainly would like to ask for the support of Members, the support of the government, in encouraging and negotiating for a road through Wood Buffalo National Park to go to Fort Vermilion. I believe that this dream will become a reality. I ask for the support of Members on this particular initiative. Thank you.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

Page 591

The Speaker

Thank you, Mrs. Marie-Jewell. The seconder of the motion, Mr. Whitford.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

Page 591

Tony Whitford

Tony Whitford Yellowknife South

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Fellow Members of the Assembly, I have spoken on this subject before. Members, those who were here with us a little while ago know my position well on it. I have been dealing with this issue since the early 1960s. I was in town council in Fort Smith in the 1960s. At the time, we were quite in favour of a southern link through Fort Vermilion. As a matter of fact, there was, at that time, even a very good winter road that went to Fort Vermilion. There was a bit of a problem with some of the hills, a couple of places where they needed some work done on the bridge, but short of that, that road wasn't in too bad of shape and would have taken, at the time, very little to have made that connection. There was already a right of way cleared to the park, past Pine Lake. There were a couple of places that needed more permanent structure for a bridge.

I agree that, economically, this would be good for the territories. Tourists that I have spoken to, numerous times, including those who do come all the way from the south to our city here in Yellowknife, are reluctant to drive that long drive back. Tourists prefer loop roads where they can go in one way and out another. By opening this road, this would certainly mean an increase in tourism potential to that area. In turn, more tourism dollars flowing into the north would benefit economically the Northwest Territories, the community of Fort Smith.

My Transportation friend knows my position on this, and I know he says he is going to have to take some money out of our budget to do this, but I think there has been some commitment made. Perhaps not so much commitment, but certainly suggestions from senior Ottawa people. I don't want to pigeonhole the Prime Minister, but he has shown an interest in looking at this project again. We must not forget that he was Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs at about that very time that that road was in use back in the 1960s. He had been to Fort Smith and the late Mayor Kaeser had bent his ear many times on this subject.

Without prolonging the debate, I would support it wholeheartedly. It is good for the Northwest Territories. It is something that has been long in coming. I think that, in turn, will put more dollars into the territories, where we can do more things with those extra dollars that we do get. Thank you very much.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

Page 591

The Speaker

Thank you, Mr. Whitford. To the motion, Mr. Koe.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

Page 591

Fred Koe Inuvik

Mahsi, Mr. Speaker. Before making a decision, I have to get some clarification on some of the points raised by the honourable Member for Thebacha. I, for one, fully support all highway development in the Northwest Territories and have expressed my opinions as such, but I do have some concerns and I will raise these concerns. Hopefully, before the vote, I will get some clarification. Initial reaction was how much would this cost and what would be the impact in cost to this government. Another issue is, since most of this road is in Alberta, how much would the Alberta Government be contributing to the development of such a road? Before supporting this particular piece of highway, I obviously would put my priorities in supporting an extension of the highway from Wrigley to Norman Wells to Inuvik and eventually to Tuktoyaktuk. But, before that, I definitely would like to see an upgrade of the Dempster Highway.

The honourable Member for Thebacha mentioned that it is 72 miles of cut line. We all know what comes next. It is chip seal and paving. Again, those are costly. I would support this motion, Mr. Speaker, if the mover or someone would clarify that this would be done at very minimal costs and would be used as a training project for Arctic College heavy equipment program.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

Page 592

The Speaker

That is not really a mechanism for clarification, but if the mover, in her concluding comments, make statements which allay your fears, then you will act accordingly, I am sure. To the motion. Mr. Lewis.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

Page 592

Brian Lewis Yellowknife Centre

I will be brief, as well, Mr. Speaker. I lived in Fort Smith briefly for a couple of years, 1972 to 1974. That was the subject of conversation at that time and apparently had been the subject of conversation for twenty years before that. It was always felt that, if there was one thing that would change the structural economy, it would be if it had a road somehow south through the park into Alberta. That dream has persisted for many years and there has been a lack of political will at the level where these decisions are made, to achieve that result. I agree that the kind of conditions that the person who has proposed this motion to us has given, that it would be an attempt to get back to where we were in late 1960s, to follow up on the project that had been abandoned and to do it at a cost that we can afford. For that reason, I will support the motion.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

Page 592

The Speaker

To the motion. Mr. Todd.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

Page 592

John Todd Keewatin Central

Thank you. Given that I am the Minister of Transportation, I will have to go out there to seek the funding. I think it is important to state that a review of the Transportation initiative to place, a few months ago. It was based upon the advice that we were given by the 24 MLAs. We will be tabling it next week. That is not in the transportation strategy. I see this motion as outside of what we were trying to accomplish with the existing budget that we have. There is $37.5 million out there, not $370 million. I want to make it clear that I have said to the honourable Member, I think it is creative initiative. The approach has been suggested that we use Arctic College. We will take a hard look at it. But, it is important to say that we have to take a hard look at it, if we can find new dollars. I can't do what has to be done now with the existing dollars I have. There is incredible pressure on the Ministry by everybody concerned. I support the motion. We will take a look at putting some clinical energy to help make that commitment now. We will try to be a little bit creative, but I have to caution you in saying that we must look for new resources to do this kind of initiative. Under the current budgetary constraints that we are working with, it would be difficult to realign dollars when there are greater priorities. On the one hand, yes, I will support the motion, but we have to look for new funds to do it. Thank you.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

Page 592

The Speaker

Thank you, Mr. Todd. To the motion. Mr. Arvaluk.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

Page 592

James Arvaluk Aivilik

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. We are getting into a very awkward position because we do support infrastructures to be built and we also support economic development in the north. However, when we have major issues to deal with, we usually discuss it either in the Ordinary Members' Caucus, the Standing Committee on Finance, the Standing Committee on Agencies, Boards and Commissions or the full caucus, as part of the planning process. For example, social housing federal cutbacks and other major issues that need to be dealt with. We usually try to work cooperatively as ordinary Members as to what are the priorities that government should look at as a long term plan. This motion came as a surprise. I feel that we should, for initiatives for that area, discuss it longer, through perhaps a three week period, as one of the major issues that we put together that we want to deal with. Education strategies, et cetera, are not cheap. They are expensive, either way you look at it. If it is a recommendation, then we would have made a recommendation. At this time, I will be abstaining from the motion. Thank you.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

Page 592

The Speaker

To the motion. Mr. Ng.

Motion 8-12(4): Road Construction Through Wood Buffalo National Park, Carried As Amended
Item 15: Motions

Page 592

Kelvin Ng Kitikmeot

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I think we all generally would support initiatives that would bring the possibility of enhanced economic development to any of our communities. As Mr. Todd stated, this particular project may be outside of the realm of the new transportation strategy, as being proposed. I would like to suggest, creating more national recognition for this project, to move an amendment, seconded by the honourable Member for Yellowknife Centre, Mr. Lewis. The amendment being:

AND FURTHER, that this House recommend that the Speaker communicate this support for the road to the Speaker of the House of Commons and the Prime Minister of Canada.