Thank you, Mr. Chairman. That figure seemed to be familiar to me because when I look at the 1996/97 capital estimates, again there were no prior year costs, so I do not know where the $300,000 came from. There were no future years anticipated in the 1996/97 capital, but now the figure the Minister just gave me was the figure spent last year, $204,000. Is the Minister telling me that there is a typographical error last year also for Sylvia Grinnell Park and now this year again? There is an error for prior year costs and future years again, but he is telling me there is money in the capital. My point is again maybe only in Sylvia Grinnell Park, only in two books, two mains, there seems to be mistakes. I want this clarified because it is an important project. I brought representation to the Minister, I went to the Resource Committee months ago on this and it seems to me there are discrepancies. I do not want to make any allegations and I am not making allegations, but it does not make any sense here. I do have the 1996/97 mains and there is no anticipated and there were no prior year costs. The Minister just told me prior year costs was $300,000. In the capital estimates from last year, I see $204,000, which is the same amount now that is supposed to be in the budget for next year. Could someone clarify it please?

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I am not trying to be adversarial, I am not trying to make any accusations. So, the Minister will confirm now, for the record in the Hansard, that indeed future years anticipated for '97, '98, '99, which is next year, the Department of Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development is actually budgeting $200 and some odd for this park. Every other Member in this House can look at their capital in parks and visitors' service and those Members can see what is in the capital estimates prior year costs, future's anticipated and total capital projections. I cannot because it is not listed because of a typographical error. When I go back in my book from last year's main estimates, the same problem occurred again. Maybe it is just an Iqaluit thing, I do not know. I would like the Minister to confirm right now, for the record, what the actual capital expenditure projections are for next year and the total capital projections for the Hansard.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, can the Minister tell me what the actual expenditures were last year? I know now and thank the Minister for anticipating $939,000 over the next x number of years, I still do not know what is in the budget for next year. I understood it was $200,000 for this year, it is only $50,000. I would like to know how much was expended for 1996/97 exactly? And I will ask the same question again, what is proposed for next year in their revised capital plan?

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, for the record, I am looking at page 11-16, Sylvia Grinnell Park, Iqaluit.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I guess it is as clear as mud. The point I was trying to make is this, Mr. Chairman. If I look at the '96/97 main estimates detail of capital, there was $204,000 approved last year to be expended in my park in the constituency of Iqaluit. That would mean, according to Mr. Kakfwi's figures which, with the prior year costs of $332,000 in the past 12 to 15 years, since that park has been in place there has been $108,000 spent over that 12 year period which gives me the total of $332,000. When I look at the 97-98 main estimates, Mr. Chairman, the total budget is $50,000 but there is no prior year's cost and there were no future years anticipated and it seems to be a typographical error according to the Minister. Then the Minister came back for clarification purposes and he said that for next year, you are looking at $204,000 budgeted for 1998-99 for my park for Iqaluit. But that was also the same amount that was in 1996/97 which is $204,000. The two points that I am trying to make are was it the same typographical error or omission just for Sylvia Grinnell Park in both books and I would take the Minister's word that it is a coincidence again, but I guess that is what happened. Then my question on the $50,000 was, how much money was spent last year, because there was $204,000 budgeted. How much was actually spent? Was the total spent? Because if that was the case, it shows that park, which has been in existence for about 12 years, has had $332,000, roughly less than $12,000 a year over that period of time.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Before this year, the actual expenditures were $128,000. The current year budget is $204,000. The current year is not complete yet and I do not have the expenditures to date with me. We can certainly get that information to see what the actual expenditures are or are projected to be by the end of this current 1996-97 year. As noted, we have budgeted for '97-'98. $50,000 and the projected numbers, which are shown in the five year capital plan, are $204,000 for '98-'99, $237,000 for '99-2000, and $200,000 and $300,000 in the next two years. The only actuals we can provide are prior years. This year we will do that. We can certainly provide actuals at the close of the year and we certainly can provide the Member with year-to-date expenditures on that project. Thank you.