Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate the Minister's response, and support that move. I would like to go back to the issue of the relationship between the departments and the boards, also to examine again the number of reports that we have and where we are going with bringing in Mr. Cuff to do another review.
My concern comes from the numbers of times we have had different reports. Look at the report that the Child Welfare League did. They talk about the dynamic tension that exists between the Department of Health and Social Services and boards with regard to the need for accountability and the need for flexibility.
While they talk about one aspect only, I think that the whole issue of tension exists between the need for the Minister to be accountable to this House, the department to make sure that they can help the Minister to be accountable, and the issue of providing services at the local level.
One of the things that the Child Welfare League report noted was that the key to successfully negotiating the unnecessary tension between the two seemingly conflicting agendas is for the two parties to continue to work in partnership to meet their respective responsibilities.
Whether or not that will be successful, they say, depends on the skilled negotiation of the interface, which creates the dynamic tension. If it is successful, it will strengthen the processes and the outcome.
That report was done in May 2000. In July 2000, Minister Groenewegen published the Minister's Response to the 1999 Forum on Health and Social Services.
A number of the forum recommendations had to do with governance. They talked about the need to clarify roles and responsibilities of each player, but one of the other key recommendations of the Minister's forum was the need to devolve responsibility and funding to boards for most health and social services programs.
Obviously, one of the recommendations they followed up with, after that, was that there needs to then be a procedure established for flowing board responsibilities to communities.
The Minister, in her response, indicated, now some time ago, that a revised funding formula was being developed during the current fiscal year. I have not heard that there is a new funding formula. I have heard that there is difficulty with understanding numbers, so that we have not agreed on budgets.
Are we, in fact, moving, as the forum had recommended, to a funding formula, which would take into account services that were expected to be delivered, and the population served, including the movement of populations within the North?
I think that is going to be of interest to us. This was promised to us last year. In fact, if we look at the strategic plan of the Department of Health, which was presented to Members some time ago, this was exactly as stated in there.
One of the strategic directions was to improve management of the system by clarifying the roles and responsibilities of the department, boards, private service providers, and non-profit organizations.
One of the other strategic directions was to improve the overall functioning of the public system of health and social services by promoting strong relationships between agencies and governments.
One way to do that was to improve the allocation of financial resources to boards through funding methods, which reflect population characteristics and board responsibilities.
In the business plan last year, Mr. Chairman, we were told that the department was going to develop clearer reporting and accountability requirements for system partners, develop clearer working relationships for system partners, and continue to develop appropriate funding arrangements for boards and NGOs.
So we have a couple of reports that have suggested to the department that they need to work more closely with boards and need to find a way to be more supportive. In fact, in a response to one of those reports, the Minister herself appears to agree with that direction and commit the department to moving that way.
So I have to ask, as a question, knowing that this was happening, why is such an importance being placed now on the recommendations on governance that we are expecting from the report from Mr. Cuff?
We have already, it would appear to me, gotten an awful lot of recommendations here. We appear to be moving to deal with only some of these recommendations and now we have embarked on another study, when we had two other studies that already told us what to do. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.